MIN RDC 2011-10-21.tif - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

MR. CARVALHO: And the other case is trying to keep the communities together, which Waikoloa was advocating for that too. MR. MELROSE: Does anyone have any more thoughts on this, or can we move on to Plan-46? CHR. SIRACUSA: I would like to take a better look at Puna. MR. KAHUI: I would like to comment on the earlier point raised about the Supreme Court decision regarding the deviation. This is one of those cases, whether it be between District 9 and District 1, or District 8 and District 9; wherein I think we take these kinds of community input to which we validate the concerns by the community about keeping those communities contiguous. These redistricting boundaries are somewhat political in nature when you talk about voting for your council person. Interestingly enough, the representatives from each district are guided by those boundaries. That said, once again, if the communities want to be part of this continuous effort to be a part of the same community, then I think the Supreme Court ruling precedent sets the tone for us to make those kinds of decisions. MS. POINDEXTER: But the Supreme Court ruling was trumped by the Ordinance. Because what Pat had explained was that the Ordinance was not in place when the Supreme Court ruling was made. MR. KAHUI: I understood that. MS. POINDEXTER: So I think that would bring us into a real difficult situation because the Ordinance, I think, will trump the Supreme Court ruling. Is that right? MR. CHANG: Not exactly. Fundamentally, the word would not be "trump." The Ordinance is something that the court will consider. It will weigh - -I can't predict what the court will do but it will look at its own precedent, the prior Supreme Court case. It will consider that, but the fact that there is an Ordinance now I would suggest to you that it will actually view the Ordinance very strongly. But again, it will also consider its prior precedence, that prior case as well. But to tell you what it does with it, I can't predict. MS. POINDEXTER: Because, the community, the grassroots, spoke loud and clear; they would want to be kept together. That means we go off of what the Ordinance says. I think the grassroots deserves, they fought strong and hard, and they have been split for these past ten years, and they want to be put back together. And the Ordinance just doesn't allow that to happen for them. I am in favor of challenging that, and standing up for the grassroots. MR. CARVALHO: As soon as it was known that I was going to be on the Commission, my phone was ringing off the hook. All these constituents from the Waimea area, that are in Hamakua now, and we should listen to these people. MR. CHANG: You have a certain amount of discretion in your decision making process, so as long as you act reasonably, you consider the Ordinance, keeping in mind also what the public has 16