COMM. 51.30 - 51.44 re Hilo Districts

Home

11/21/2011 14:24 808- 961 -8912 COUNTY CLERK PAGE 05/11 M1,21/2011 11:52 18089612490 RI LO. ILWCT #3919 P.001/008 To: chairwoman and Members of the Redistrict Commission, for Hilo Meeting RE: Testimony in Opposition to present map for piskrict 2 and District 3 After viewing the proposed map, E wonder wiry the commissioners in District 2, 3 and 4 didn't draw the lints going North to South" as how it has always been. District 2 has represented the "rural and urban communities. District 4 his always been the "mix district" and District 3 was also a mix of "rural, urban and business in KeaauA. but now, you want to change all this, as testifiers came to you, "keep agi, agi! ", "keep Puna, Puna ", then "KEEP RURAL,/URBAN" in District Z and "KEEP District 4 MIX ". Remember, your job was to make the (Fees easier and clea and "NQi" make it more difficult and rNi�h ;a 2d�IitlpS. You cannot use this as a personal agenda; you need think how these districts would lost service the "'People" of those districts in Hilo. Here is an option that you could consider, go back to using the following streets as the boundaries; from Wailuku Ricer go to either Komohana or Ka.piniani Streets to divide Districts 2 and 3. This way, you would start from the North end of Hilo and go south to Keaau. this makes more sense than what you have proposed. This will not affect any other districts because you are only Oangins the lines in Milo, remember its up to the three commissioners in Qistrigt 2, 3 and 4 to work together and came up with the "best" representation for Hilo. So please reconsider changing the lines and uKEEP" District 2 as a "rural and urban" and District 3 as the "mix". 'hank you, � �, c `-) 0 �r �t COMM. 51.36