My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Planning Director's Letter to the Puna CDP Steering Committee
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Action Committees (AC)
>
Puna Community Development Plan Action Committee
>
Pre-2018 Files
>
Communications to AC
>
2006
>
Planning Director's Letter to the Puna CDP Steering Committee
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2011 10:24:05 AM
Creation date
11/30/2011 10:24:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Because some of these, such as the Paradise Park sites, are currently not available <br />because they have not been developed, the Department has recommended, and the <br />Planning Commission approved, several special permits with 5 years terms, with the <br />condition that if the designated sites are developed, that they should move there when the <br />five years is up. <br /> <br />The Planning Department has supported small-scale special permits for businesses that <br />would generally fall under the category of Ðhome occupations.Ñ These are businesses <br />that are operated by the occupant of a home on the property, with a maximum of one <br />employee other than the occupants, and some other limitations. They are allowed as a <br />matter of right in residentially-zoned areas, such as most neighborhoods in Hilo, but the <br />current zoning code requires home occupations in the agricultural district to get a special <br />permit. As a practical matter, there are undoubtedly hundreds o <br />businesses operating in Puna. <br /> <br />4. What should the county do to help improve infrastructure in the private <br /> subdivisions? <br /> <br />For the last few decades, the county government has consistently taken the position that it <br />would not take over the private roads within the subdivisions, nor would it subsidize <br />improvements to those roads. The only major exception was Ainal <br />taken over by the county to create an alternative access out of lower Puna. <br /> <br />There were, and are, strong fiscal reasons for this policy. The private roads are <br />substandard, and the cost of improving them is high. To own them without improving <br />them would expose the county to significant liability for accidents. But roughly a third of <br />the population increase on the island is going into these Puna subdivisions. <br /> <br />The Puna CDP can at least discuss what options exist for financing improvements within <br />the subdivisions, such as improvement districts. <br /> <br />5. Where should new county facilities be built? <br /> <br />Basic county facilitiesÏparks, fire and police stationsÏhave not been built in Puna at the <br />same pace as the population increase. One major focus of the CD <br />facilities, especially parks. Where should they be located? Given the need to properly <br />allocate limited resources, what should be the balance between parks that serve a large <br />region (like the Pahoa pool, or the current concept of a Puna Gym and regional ballfield <br />complex near the Kahakai Blvd./Hwy. 130 intersection), and more neighborhood- <br />not <br />oriented parks? Do neighborhoods want parks (because they can be magnets for <br />undesirable activities)? <br /> <br />6. How can the county foster the development of community gathering places? <br /> <br />Community gathering places help weave the fabric of community life. Planners speak of <br />Ðthird placesÑÏother than the home and workÏwhere people can spend time and meet <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.