2011-08-24 KCDP Minutes Final - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Marni Herkes motioned that Table 2 be amended as follows: A) assemblies RA-24-24 (in T5) 40 and RL-30-12 (in T3 & T4) be replaced with image RL-20-16 which allows greater yard 41 space and simplifies maintenance as desired by DPW; B) Add assembly AV-61-34 widening 42 one sidewalk to accommodate multi-use path in areas where additional non-auto capacity is 43 desirable; C) Add AC-68-46, adding a bicycle lane in each direction; D) Add CS-82-46, 44 adding a bicycle lane in each direction; E) Add AV-94-46, adding a bicycle lane in each 45 direction to CS-80-56 and widening the median; F) Revise CS-80-56 to show reverse-angle 46 parking; G) Add a PA-XX-10 to provide sufficient right of way to accommodate the 47 switchback Shared Use Path at a maximum 5% gradient; H) Add a RD-78-36 to provided a 48 road configuration that maximizes accommodation of pedestrians of all abilities and bicyclists 49 of all skill levels to include 12 foot travel lanes, shoulder bikeways, sidewalk and shared use 50 path; and, I) Requesting the County/Placemakers create an index that lists each approved 51 Assembly and to conform the above sections to be consistent with the images of the other 52 assemblies in table 2. Bob Ward seconded and unanimous approval given (Janice Palma- 53 Glennie was not yet present at the time of this motion and vote) 54 To address the concerns brought up by Nancy Pisicchio a Sub-Committee was created to 55 work with the Design Center and Ownership groups within Multi-Owner TODs to develop 56 Master Plans for these TODs. This would then allow these small landowners to come in for 57 their applications and still meet the premise of the KCDP’s 80 acre TOD. All Action 58 Committees supported the creation of the Sub-Committee. Chair of this Sub-Committee will 59 be Ken Melrose and Mike Matsukawa will be on as well, with the first community member 60 Nancy Pisicchio. 61 2. Financial Plan. 62 The Action Committee discussed the status of the review of the draft Public Facilities 63 Finance Plan review with Dave Freudenberger, Goodwin Consulting Group. The discussion 64 also identified the process that might occur for the next steps for the Finance Plan. 65 ‘ The Chair shared with the Action Committee a letter from the Queen Liliuokalani Trust 66 conveying their concern that the draft Finance Plan lacks discussion as it relates to the 67 Trust’s Keahuolū lands. The Action Committee discussed the concerns raised with Dave 68 ‘ Freudenberger. The Dave confirmed that Queen Liliuokalani Trust lands are represented 69 within the analysis with both the residential and commercial numbers. 70 Discussion of the electronic analysis tools available to the general public from various public 71 sites and how the updated information would impact on the analysis of the Finance Plan. 72 These updates would have relatively small impact because the plan anticipates growth, on the 73 short the information would validate the information presented within the draft plan. 74 A question came up on whether the Open Space Network Plan was included into the draft 75 Finance Plan. Dave confirmed that it had not, that the amount number was estimated to be 76 relatively small and that because there was no information to base the analysis on to generate 77 the actual estimated number. Discussion moved to how that information could be generated 78 and therefore how that amount would then be included into the plan. 79 Page 2 of 5