My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-11-17 Leeward Planning Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-11-17 Leeward Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2011 3:35:14 PM
Creation date
12/15/2011 3:35:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
approximately 3,500 feet east (mauka) of Hawai‘i Belt Road in the vicinity of mile marker 90, <br />‘Alikā ahupua‘a, South Kona, Hawai‘i, TMK: 8-8-001: portion of 003. <br /> <br />The Commission took this item up at 10:01 a.m. with three people from the public in attendance. <br /> <br />Ms. Cottle oriented the Commission and public of the subject and surrounding properties on the <br />location map and site plan, and summarized the request. She pointed out that the applicant had <br />brought to her attention that the Site Sketch within the application erroneously indicated the <br />proposed tower on the makai side of the existing tower, and that it would actually be located mauka <br />of the existing tower. She noted that the Planning Director recommended approval of the <br />application with conditions. In response to Commissioner Whittemore’s question as to whether or <br />not there was any input from the surrounding property owners, Ms. Cottle said that she had received <br />one phone call from the owner of the nearest residence, which is approximately 1,000 feet from the <br />subject site, who wanted to make sure that his line of sight would not be affected. <br /> <br />The applicant’s consultant, Les Young, stated that because of its terrain, siting towers for <br />continuous coverage on the Big Island had always been a challenge to cell phone companies, and <br />that the purpose of the proposed tower was to improve the wireless communication coverage, which <br />would benefit the community, as well as tourists. In response to Chair Giffin’s questions, he further <br />said that the current network had a tendency to give intermittent signal especially when there were <br />many users at the same time, and that they had not received any inquiries about collocation from <br />other wireless carriers. Commissioner Hickcox’s asked whether or not the tower would be <br />accessible by government agencies for an emergency or any other reasons, he said that the tower <br />would be built for potential additional usage, but that he was not involved in and therefore could not <br />comment on the area of financial arrangements. <br /> <br />There was no one from the public wishing to testify in regard to this application. <br /> <br />It was moved by Commissioner Beaudet and seconded by Commissioner Whittemore that the <br />application be approved for the reasons and with the conditions as recommended by the Planning <br />Director. A roll call vote was taken and motion carried with six ayes (Beaudet, Whittemore, <br />Bowman, Hickcox, Iokepa and Giffin) and one absent and excused (Nelson). <br /> <br />APPLICANT: HOLUALOA LIKANA, LLC (AMEND SMA-06-000015) <br />4. <br />Request for an amendment to allow for a 5-year time extension to Condition No. 3 (complete <br />construction) of Special Management Area Use Permit No. 06-000015, which allowed the <br />development of a commercial parking lot with 128 stalls and landscaping improvements on <br />approximately 1.23 acres situated within the County’s Special Management Area (SMA). The <br />property is located on the makai side of Kuakini Highway at the junction of Kuakini Highway <br />and Henry Street, Kailua-Kona, North Kona, Hawaii, TMK: 7-5-006: 001. <br /> <br />The Commission took this item up at 10:17 a.m. with one person from the public in attendance. <br /> <br />Mr. Darrow oriented the Commission and public of the subject and surrounding properties on the <br />location map and site photographs, and summarized the request. He noted that the Planning <br />Director recommended approval of the amendment with revised conditions. In response to Chair <br />Giffin’s inquiry, he clarified that the applicant had received a two-year administrative extension <br />when the original permit expired and was now asking for an additional five-year extension due to <br />the current unfavorable economic condition. <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.