Laserfiche WebLink
<br />BOWMAN: Thank you for your clarification, because that was my concern exactly that we have <br />that stipulation, which is it has no cumulative impact or substantial adverse environmental or <br />ecological effect. Because, you know, our shoreline is getting smaller and smaller. So I appreciate <br />that clarification. <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Well, specifically what it was is somebody who didn’t have very much <br />buildable area, so they were proposing to have a zero setback from the shoreline, which basically <br />would have been a wall right on the shoreline. And we just felt that, given the location of the <br />property, that the impact of any wave action in the area could have unintended consequences on the <br />surrounding property in the area. So we said SMA Major, and they ended up withdrawing their <br />application. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Okay, thank you for the clarification. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Commissioners, any other questions of staff and/or the Director? I should also mention <br />that there is no one from the public here to provide public testimony. Daryn, did you want to say <br />something? <br /> <br />ARAI: Sure. Just one thing is that since this is an amendment to your Rules, this matter is also <br />scheduled before the Windward Planning Commission. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: That’s right, because we are one. <br /> <br />ARAI: Right. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Commissioners, I’d like to direct you to Page 3 of the Background report, which is a <br />recommendation; the Planning Director recommends that the Planning Commission both, as Daryn <br />said, Windward and Leeward, adopt the proposed amendments. Do I hear a motion for us? <br /> <br />IOKEPA: Madam Chair, I propose a motion that recommends that the Planning Commission adopt <br />the proposed amendments. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Do I hear a second? <br /> <br />HICKCOX: Second. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: It’s been moved by Commissioner Iokepa and seconded by Commissioner Hickcox that <br />we adopt, no, send a positive recommendation to adopt the proposed amendments as proposed by <br />the Planning Director. <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Madam Chair, the motion should be to approve, because we are not <br />forwarding this to the County Council, but it’s that strange situation where both Planning <br />Commissions will have to both move to approve and have to approve the same language. <br />Otherwise, we are going to have to go back and forth between the Commissions. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Thank you. May I please rephrase for the maker of the motion and the seconder that we <br />approve the proposed amendments as proposed by the Planning Director? Does that meet with your <br />approval, the maker of the motion and the seconder? <br />4 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />