My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COMM. 58.2 from R. Bidleman
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2011 Redistricting Commission
>
Communications
>
COMM. 58.2 from R. Bidleman
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2011 10:39:32 AM
Creation date
12/15/2011 4:15:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Testimony, Communications 58, December 16, 2011 <br />I, along with several others from Friends of Puna's Future and interested Puna <br />residents, have followed the redistricting process from the beginning, which has <br />encompassed many months. <br />Under the new ground rules, the public could submit plans for consideration. <br />Friends of Puna's Future as well as other residents of the county submitted <br />several redistricting plans. I think we can say, in most cases, there was significant <br />public participation. Some of the suggestions were incorporated into the final <br />plan. <br />One of the themes that played successfully at most community meetings was not <br />to divide communities. Pahoa town was split right down the middle. It is now in <br />two districts. It did not have to be that way. The committee could have placed <br />Pahoa town in one district. To do so would have required including part or all of <br />Keaau town in one of two Puna districts. It was expressed time and time again <br />that Puna historically consisted of three communities — Pahoa, Keaau and <br />Volcano. Given the numbers, Volcano could not remain in Puna and went over to <br />the Kau district. However, a good portion of Keaau could have been given over to <br />a Puna district. In all the hearings I attended, which was most of them, not one <br />person came forward saying they wanted Keaau in a Hilo district. In fact, several <br />people expressed an interest in wanting to remain in the Puna district. What I <br />saw at the last meeting I attended was a committee member coming forward <br />with a plan that split Pahoa down the middle and placed Keaau in a Hilo district, <br />with the rational that Keaau relates more to Hilo than Puna. For those of us who <br />live in Puna, we know this is not true. Keaau is the gateway to Puna. Most of the <br />people who shop in Keaau are Puna residents. The majority of the businesses in <br />Shipman Industrial Park (HPM, Puna Rentals, Hawaii Catchment, etc) are serving <br />Puna more than Hilo. With Puna being the fastest growing area on the Island this <br />is more likely to increase. Puna needs jobs. When Shipman representatives made <br />their argument at the final consideration of the Puna Community Development <br />Plan at a county council meeting held in I<eaau, they were talking a lot about job <br />creation. <br />Additionally, we all know that various constituencies came forward at the <br />meetings held around the island to express their preference for redistricting. <br />Look back in the transcripts. I don't think you will find anyone coming forward to <br />express an interest in Keaau being in a Hilo district. <br />Respectfully submitted <br />Richard Bidleman <br />Pahoa <br />COMM. 58.2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.