Laserfiche WebLink
: <br />Question <br />4.Can a wastewater impact fee be effective for homes that are <br />on a catchment system? <br />Response: <br /> A wastewater impact fee will only be assessed for new <br />development that is within the service area of existing municipal <br />wastewater treatment plants. <br />: <br />Question <br />5.How were the maximum allowable impact fee values <br />determined? <br />Response: <br /> They were calculated as the net cost to maintain the existing <br />level of service, after taking into consideration other taxes and fees that <br />would be generated by new development and available to fund capacity- <br />expanding improvements. <br />: <br />Question <br />6. How will the expenditure of impact fees be prioritized? <br />Response: <br /> The prioritization of spending impact fees could be a collective <br />decision made by the Council and the Administration, with input by the <br />public. As projects are approved for funding during the budgetary approval <br />process, decisions could be made about which projects should receive <br />how much money from impact fee sources. With community development <br />planning efforts being initiated island-wide, it is hoped that some <br />prioritization of projects will be voiced through these meetings. <br />: <br />Question <br />7. I own a buildable lot right now; if I apply for a building permit in <br />one year will I have to spend $12,000 extra to cover impact fees? <br />Response: <br /> If an application is made for a building permit prior to the <br />effective date of the impact fee ordinance, then no impact fee will be <br />required. Applications submitted subsequent to the effective date of the <br />ordinance will be required to pay the impact fees. Also, keep in mind, that <br />$12,000 represents the maximum amount that the administration can <br />apply; and a decision can be made to apply a percentage of the maximum <br />amount. <br />: <br />Question <br />8. I disagree that a one year phase-in period would limit or <br />eliminate any disruption to the real estate market of projects that are “in <br />the pipeline.” This is primarily because projects in Hawaii can be “in the <br />pipeline” for three years before ground is broken, especially if <br />State/Federal financing and/or tax credits are involved (which is usually <br />the case for affordable housing projects). Taking that timeline into <br />consideration, as well as the need for supply, why can’t an exemption for <br />affordable housing be created for impact fees? Isn’t the application of “fair- <br />share”/disproportionate share a policy call? <br />Public Meeting Questions and AnswersPage 2 <br />August 15 & 16, 2006 <br /> <br />