Laserfiche WebLink
the County Board of Water Supply (as stated in HRS, Chapter 46). The <br />Board of Water Supply has already adopted connection fees that function <br />like impact fees. <br />: <br />Question <br />8. I was under the impression that impact fees can only be used <br />to maintain level of service at the time of adoption and spent based on a <br />capital improvement plan. How does this study ordinance address these? <br />Response: <br /> The Infrastructure and Public Facilities Needs Assessment <br />Study determined an island-wide level of service for all infrastructural <br />elements contained in the report. Costs for future CIP projects are <br />included in the study analysis. Actual funding of specific projects will <br />ultimately be the responsibility of the County Council as part of the <br />budgetary process. <br />: <br />Question <br />9. How would these fees be balanced for areas with private water <br />and/or wastewater systems (e.g., Waikoloa Village)? <br />Response: <br /> Impact fees cannot be collected for potable water facilities, <br />and will not be imposed on areas that are not part of a municipal <br />wastewater service area. <br />: <br />Question <br />10. Why is a solid waste fee not applied for uses other than single- <br />family residential? <br />Response: <br /> Commercial entities wind up paying a tipping fee when they <br />dispose of solid waste. This is collected when the business (or entity) <br />either dumps solid waste themselves, or hires a third party to collect and <br />dispose of solid waste. The tipping fee is a “pay as you go” system. <br />: <br />Question <br />11. There seems to be both State and County roads in the <br />inventory. So, is the County collecting fees to improve State roads? <br />Response: <br /> The IPFNA study calculated maximum chargeable impact <br />fees for County and State roadways, individually. This was in response to <br />an initiative proposed and passed by the Legislature this year, and signed <br />by the Governor, amending HRS Chapter 264, which gives all the <br />Counties the ability to fund State roadway projects with monies collected <br />by the assessment of impact fees. The value of the maximum fee that <br />could be charged for State roadways is significantly higher than the fee for <br />County roadways, and raises the overall value of impact fees to a very <br />high number. It will be up to the County Council to decide if such a fee is <br />warranted and how much of the maximum fee to charge. <br />: <br />Question <br />12. Would the consequences of non-payment of impact fees be the <br />same as non-payment of taxes? <br />Public Meeting Questions and AnswersPage 6 <br />August 15 & 16, 2006 <br /> <br />