Laserfiche WebLink
a constitutional issue is asking fees for existing lots? How did we get to the 64,000? How many of <br />those are owned by “State of HI” residents? <br />Option 5a: Everyone pays with a credit to “substandard” subdivisions <br />Option 6: Long term residence (sic) don’t pay fee unless they are sell (sic) (speculator) (like state 10 <br />year plan) <br />Option 7: Needs more work <br />FINAL POLL: Zero for Options 1, 2 and 4; 3 for Option 3; 5 for Option 5a; 6 for Option 6; 6 for <br />Option 7 <br />Hilo Group 3 <br />Summary of discussion: Very complex issue; see option #5. <br />Option 5: All previous lots pay, with an offset for low income owner-occupants based on a sliding <br />scale in accordance with affordable housing policy. <br />FINAL POLL: We all agree that Option #5 should be considered. <br />Hilo Group 4 <br />Summary of discussion: Option 4 not viable vs. creating improvement districts <br />Assessment districts <br />Already built lots <br />BI owners v. off-island/out of state owners- why not have everyone pay? <br />Option 5: Impose impact fees to all lots in existence from date or ordinance. (against grace period <br />because it potentially benefits the wrong people/penalizes the wrong people). No waiver period or <br />exemption for 1 SF unit. <br />FINAL POLL: Zero for Options 1, 2 and 4; 2 for Option 3; 4 for Option 5 <br />Hilo Group 5 <br />Summary of discussion: Lots of confusion about if commercial development was included in the <br />discussion. How are mixed used property handled? Eg. a store with residential above. Can we factor <br />in residency/non-residency in the charge of I.F.? Are we getting all the property owners (in and out <br />of states) voices heard? <br />Option 5: Existing lot owners will not get assessed impact fee, if lot gets transferred, new owners get <br />assessed impact fee. <br />FINAL POLL: Zero for Options 1, 2 and 4; 2 for Option 3 with condition: “2-5year”; 3 for Option 5 <br />and 1 abstained <br />Hilo Group 6 <br />[ALICE NOTES: very difficult to decipher this report – some notes but not good recording] <br />FINAL POLL: <br />Option 1 – 3 <br />Option 2 – 0 <br />Option 3 – 2 <br />Option 4 – 1 <br />st <br />Option 5 – 3 Collect upon 1 sale of developed property <br />Option 6 – 1 Each district will determine its own treatment of existing lots <br />15 <br /> <br />