Laserfiche WebLink
-Use sliding fee schedule based on value/ size <br />-Fees should be assessed by benefit district <br />G. Fees should be spent on the side of the island (west or east) in which they were collected (two benefit <br />districts) Park fees should have five benefit districts (fig. 2) <br />AGREE: 22 <br />DISAGREE: 11 <br />SUGGESTIONS: 1 <br />-Until infrastructure ‘equilibrium’ is reached between east and west sides then island wide uniform <br />application <br />-What about north and south- 50% in one district, 50% in other districts <br />H. Rather than waive fees for affordable housing projects, the County should appropriate other funding to <br />pay the impact fees for such projects. <br />AGREE: 17 <br />DISAGREE: 1 <br />SUGGESTIONS: 1 <br />-“Affordable” doesn’t work, use “low income” <br />I. Single family fees should vary by the size of the dwelling unit to reduce the fees for smaller units <br />AGREE: 23 <br />DISAGREE: 15 <br />SUGGESTIONS: <br />-Also based on home value. To be based on number of occupants <br />K. Effective date of IF ordinance will be one year after the adoption date, during which fair share <br />contributions would continue. Once ordinance is in effect, fees could be gradually increased. <br />AGREE: 11 <br />DISAGREE: 13 <br />SUGGESTIONS: 2 <br /> - Need longer time frame to incorporate new system <br />_______________________________________________________ <br />HILO: <br />1. Are you in favor of establishing an impact fee system to benefit Hawaii County? - <br />- Post workshop <br />YES: 12 <br />NO: 2 <br />2. Are you in favor of establishing an impact fee system to benefit Hawaii County? <br />- Pre workshop <br />YES: 25 <br />NO: 1 <br />NOT SURE: 11 <br />A. IF Are for County roads, parks, Fire, Police, Solid waste & Wastewater facilities. <br />3 <br /> <br />