My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Stakeholder Wkshps_Compiled Data_Mar_06
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
General Planning Department Information
>
IPFNA
>
Community Stakeholder Meetings
>
Stakeholder Wkshps_Compiled Data_Mar_06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2011 12:59:07 PM
Creation date
12/21/2011 12:59:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 7 of policy analogies; HRS46-146 “If shall…preceded”…but as usual corp. counsel <br />interprets “shall” as “may” (discretionary). <br />Continue to dialog. Everyone needs more education on issue. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />HILO: <br />1. Based on today’s discussion, are you in favor of establishing an impact fee system to benefit the <br />County of Hawaii? <br />Yes: 17 No: 1 Not sure: 5 Did not answer: 2 Other: 3 <br />Comments: <br />Still depends how commercial/industrial developments are treated. <br />Needmuch more work re: rational nexus. <br />Will support impact fee if it: <br />Complies with statute <br />o <br />Meets requirement of needs assessment study <br />o <br />Must be predictable <br />o <br />Must be reasonable, fair share and proportionate <br />o <br />Must show nexus <br />o <br />Must stay in the “region”/”community” that contributions are made contribution district = <br />o <br />benefit district <br />Impact fees should be supplemented by other government-funding source thereby making <br />o <br />fee reasonable <br />Must have an implementation plan <br />o <br />Much more research necessary and time to incorporate PCDP into this concept. <br />Yes, generally. Not sure about the details. <br />Yes, but not sure nexus and fair share still uncertain benefit districts. (?) <br />2. Did this Stakeholder Workshop provide you with helpful information to understand the County <br />IPFNA Project? <br />Yes: 27 No: 0 Not sure: 0 Did not answer: 1 Other: 0 <br />3. Was the venue convenient and appropriate? <br />Yes: 26 No: 1 If not, why? Did not answer: 1 Other: 0 <br />35 min. one way <br />Comments: <br />Too noisy <br />Not enough parking! <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.