Laserfiche WebLink
A)B) <br />Collected fee at the time of building permit? Impact fees for repair of <br />C) <br />existing building? Fee’s- Hilo and Kona (for county of Hawaii)? Are we <br />sharing fees? <br />“Residential Parcels” = Are we talking about AG-3 parcels? It is unclear whether <br />the impact fees would apply to agricultural parcels. <br />Could existing lots be charged an impact fee if not occupied for two years or <br />more? Tax on developers of existing lots? <br />Yes…will submit later. <br />Yes. I understand all. <br />“Develop to current level…” In some volcano road locales, road potholes could <br />hide a Volkswagen. Should this be a “current standard”? <br />Fees are based on consumer-based principle for new developments and their <br />impacts. Growth of cars impact transportation facilities. How do cars proliferation <br />affect impact fees? <br />There were good questions but it would be helpful to take more questions. The <br />clearer things are the more likely we will get support for impact fees. <br />We need mayor’s bill number. Gov. Lingle proposed a similar bill last session- <br />what was its #? <br />5.How could we have improved this Video Conference Session? <br />Answers to questions showed that the respondents were not sufficiently <br />knowledgeable <br />about local conditions to be able to make an informed, reasonable <br />recommendation. Lack <br />of knowledge about non-conforming subdivisions was profound. The session <br />would be <br />improved if: <br />a. The consultants were sufficiently knowledgeable to understand the <br />questions that we asked. The way they answered demonstrated <br />they were not. <br />b. Allow much more time for questions. <br />c. Use a video projector and large screen. <br />Larger screen. <br />Little more time. <br />Impact Fee Video Conference Page 2 <br />Evaluation - January 17, 2006 <br /> <br />