MIN RDC 2011-12-16.tif - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

MR. SMITH: Oh, thank you. I'm just a "Punatick," don't worry. Anyway, the point is; you folks have done a very, very good job, and basically you see the public out here kind of wondering about this situation because of a perception of impropriety. It's unfortunate that we have had a history of impropriety in our local government. You guys have shown great integrity, as far as I'm concerned. Of course, Mr. Onishi is a character, and I don't know, I would say if the boundaries were good with Mr. Onishi and Mr. Yoshimoto in the same district; they are good. I don't see, I don't hear or see of any problem with the numbers either way. The only real problem that I have with the current plan is the dingle dangle there if Kea`au Town being sucked into District 3. Beyond that, I find that a little odd, but then again, I think the plan in general is excellent. I'm sorry that you folks on the Commission feel put out about this. This is nothing against you at all. I'm glad that you called this meeting because it is here to clear the issue up. I mean, I don't think that the last line drawn is illegal either, but if Fresh had not been stupid, in my opinion, we wouldn't even have this suggested too, that if the line before was good enough, then just re -draw it there and you have eliminated your problem. Again, this has been a long process for you, and I have seen other processes that have been very contentious and caused a lot of heartburn. But again, thank you all, and put the line back the way it was; mahalo. CHR. SIRACUSA: Thank you, Gregory. Do we have any more testifiers in Pahoa? MS. LIVELY: We do, Madam Chair. The last testifier that signed up at this time is Richard Bidleman. He is speaking on Communications 58 and 59, and representing himself. RICHARD BIDLEMAN (At this time Richard Bidleman came forward from Pahoa to address members of the Commission.) MR. BIDLEMAN: Good afternoon. I am only sorry I'm not there today. As you all know, I have had the opportunity to attend most of these meetings. I am going to give my testimony here. Karen has a copy of it. I would like to correct that testimony. I have a word on the second page of the testimony. If you look at the third line from the bottom, it says special interest to, and I meant to say special interest go; the word "to" needs to be changed to "go." I'm sure Karen will note that. I, along with several others, from the Friends of Puna's Future, and interested Puna residents, have followed this redistricting process from the beginning, which has encompassed many months for us citizens' as well. Under the new ground rules, the public could submit plans for consideration. Friends of Puna's Future, as well as other residents of the County, submitted several redistricting plans. I think we can say, in most cases, there was significant public participation. And some of those suggestions were incorporated into the Final Plan. One of the themes that played successfully at most of the community meetings, was not to divide communities. Pahoa Town was split right down the middle. It is now in two districts. It did not have to be that way. The committee could have placed Pahoa Town in one district; but to do so would have required including part of Kea`au Town in one of two Puna districts. It was expressed time and again, that Puna, historically, consisted of three 12