My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN RDC 2011-12-16.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2011 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
MIN RDC 2011-12-16.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2011 8:56:43 AM
Creation date
12/23/2011 9:57:16 AM
Metadata
Document Relationships
MIN RDC 2011-12-16
(Original Version)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Redistricting Commission\2011 Redistricting Commission\Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHR. SIRACUSA: Okay, we are all present and accounted for. We have no guests, is that <br />correct? <br />MR. KANUHA: Madam Chair, before we continue, I would like to make a motion to go <br />into Executive Session to talk about what we are actually here for, with our attorney. <br />Mr. Kanuha moved to go into Executive <br />Session to discuss with Corporation Counsel, <br />the purpose of the Special Meeting. Seconded <br />by Ms. Poindexter. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Is there any discussion? I believe we need a two - thirds vote. <br />MR. MELROSE: I just want to suggest, that we really don't know why; and I think that <br />more for the community's perspective, I want to get into a conversation that we understand <br />where it's going. The reason why we are here is not all that clear to me from a special <br />purpose perspective. So, I think it's a good idea to have a conversation, because we haven't <br />had a chance to- - -What is the authority for calling it, and all of those kinds of questions. It <br />would be helpful, useful to me, before we get to the Order of Business. <br />MS. POINDEXTER: I agree; I totally agree. We are just blindsided here. I feel blindsided <br />by this. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: I think we definitely need to have a conversation. But I am wondering <br />if it would be a good idea to have it in Executive Session; as opposed to everything else we <br />have done so far has been totally out in the open. And I think the minute we start going into <br />Executive Session, people are going to start getting suspicious. <br />MR. KANUHA: That's fine. <br />MS. POINDEXTER: And I agree with her to some point; but they already are. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: But I don't want to make it worse. I am not the be all, end all of this <br />thing; it is a vote. Is it a two - thirds vote? That is what I want to know. <br />MR. MELROSE: Any other thoughts from any other Commissioners on that? <br />MR. KAHAWAIOLA`A: Yes, I do. I too, like Commissioner Melrose; it's only what I <br />have read in the paper that has brought me here today. I thought we resolved this when we <br />had the final vote that was done all with the people here, in public. But then there is some <br />question and I don't know who is questioning. I don't know if it's the Chairman who is <br />questioning, I don't know if it's the County Clerk that is questioning, the Chief Elections <br />Officer that's questioning this thing? So, I- - -But, I said I would serve and serve the public. <br />So, I am here, and it obviously seems like it - -- Because the accusations, whether they be in <br />the media, or through an email, accuses - -one of them - -the council person that represents my <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.