My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN RDC 2011-12-16.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2011 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
MIN RDC 2011-12-16.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2011 8:56:43 AM
Creation date
12/23/2011 9:57:16 AM
Metadata
Document Relationships
MIN RDC 2011-12-16
(Original Version)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Redistricting Commission\2011 Redistricting Commission\Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHR. SIRACUSA: Our next testifier is Dean Au, representing the Hawaii Carpenter's <br />Union, and he wishes to make a comment. <br />DEAN AU <br />(At this time Dean Au came forward, representing the Hawaii Carpenter's Union to address <br />members of the Commission.) <br />MR. AU: Hello Commissioners, my name is Dean Au, and I represent the Hawaii <br />Carpenters Union. We have about 6,000 members in the State of Hawaii, of which about <br />600 of them reside on the Big Island. One comment I want to make is that, you know, I <br />appreciate everything that all of you guys are doing. I, myself, am a Commissioner. I do <br />know exactly what you guys are going through. So, first of all, I appreciate that. Second of <br />all, I want to talk about the process. We have this process in our government that we are <br />going through right now, and the most important part of it is community input. And we <br />believe that is what you guys are doing. The community is coming in, giving you input, and <br />you guys are making changes where it is needed. So, thank you very much for your time, <br />and all of your effort. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Thank you. <br />MR. KAHUL Again, madam Chair, I have a question. I don't recall you at the meeting on <br />November 22"d. Were you at the meeting on November 22"d� <br />MR. AU: You know, I come to meetings here and there. I pop in here and there. I have <br />been tracking this process for a long time, so I am aware of what is going on. I don't know <br />if I was there or not. <br />MR. KAHUL Okay. So we issued a Draft Final Plan. Are you in favor of that Final Draft <br />Plan? <br />MR. AU: I don't want to say I am in favor or not in favor, I just appreciate everything that <br />you guys are doing, and I just want to make a comment on the process that we are going <br />through, and that it is very important that you guys are taking in community input. <br />MR. KAHUL Okay, thank you. <br />MR. KANUHA: Madam Chair, just a question, real fast. Are we, with these testifiers, <br />supposed to - - -Is it okay to be engaged with them, or in dialogue with them, or - - -I want to <br />make sure we get the rules clear before - -- <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Well, it's not good to ask questions during public testimony. We are <br />supposed to keep it to a minimum. Basically, we are only supposed to ask if we need <br />clarification; if we are not sure if somebody is saying they are for something or against <br />something, or if they have sort of wandered off on a tangent and we are not really sure what <br />they are saying and we want to ask them to be a little more clear. We are not supposed to <br />engage. <br />R <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.