MIN RDC 2011-12-22.tif - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

MR. UDOVIC: I don t know, I mean, quite frankly, when we even talked about having the Commissioners respond at Public Hearings for points of clarification and that kind of thing, even some of the other Council members talked to me and said they wish that they had that ability in their meetings. I think you have to set up your own rules. But, you know, you run the danger of alienating people if you get into dialogues and arguments with them. And that is the danger, I think. MR. MELROSE: So that is a decorum that is a Chair's kind of role in doing that. So the constraint on us doing it; is it in our Rules and Procedures that says specifically you can't. MR. UDOVIC: No, I don't think, it's not in there. MR. MELROSE: So if it is not in the Rules and Procedures, and if it not - - -It is really a matter of practice. MR. UDOVIC: Right. MR. MELROSE: And it is a matter of the decorum managed by the Chair. Then it is probably not an action item, although it is a good recommendation or thought for a future Commission. But it is not necessarily something we can physically change. MR. UDOVIC: Right. MR. MELROSE: Does that meet your thought, Mike? CHR. SIRACUSA: And you know, when we talk about asking if we can ask people questions for clarification, it seems to me that the Commission should also be able to do a little clarifying without getting confrontational or entering into dialogue; just to correct misconceptions of fact. MR. CARVALHO: If I can add and get back to what Mike was talking about in our interaction with the public. Truthfully, we - -like Val had mentioned -- should be out in our communities and talking to people; however, this was a learning process too, especially for me. It was a learning process; it took me about two to three months before I finally had some grasp on what we were supposed to be doing. So, after that point, or when you are already doing this kind of stuff, it behooves the Commissioners to go out into the community and try their best to explain what is going on and how things work. CHR. SIRACUSA: Totally, I totally agree with you. Of course, one of the things that made that almost impossible was the time constraint. If you go have nine public hearings and two meetings in one month, that really doesn't give you much time to go out and interface with your community at meetings. So we get back to one of the other recommendations. But I think we should take these recommendations one at a time. Or, do you think we should sort of lump them all together under this one motion? 10