My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN RDC 2011-12-22.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2011 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
MIN RDC 2011-12-22.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2011 8:50:58 AM
Creation date
12/25/2011 1:49:12 PM
Metadata
Document Relationships
MIN RDC 2011-12-22
(Original Version)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Redistricting Commission\2011 Redistricting Commission\Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COMMUNICATIONS <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: We have none. <br />ORDER OF THE DAY / NEW BUSINESS <br />COMM. 60: DISCUSSION REGARDING FINAL REPORT <br />From Commission Chair Rene Siracusa, dated December 15, 2011; regarding the <br />preparation and filing of the Commission's Final Report to the County Clerk. <br />Ms. Ugalde moved to close file on <br />COMM. 60 Seconded by Mr. Carvalho. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Discussion? Who wants to start? <br />MR. MIDDLESWORTH: I don't have much to say about the report itself, but I must say <br />that Mike did a one hell of a good job of putting it together. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: He had a lot of help from staff, so we have to thank them as well, for <br />everything, all along the line. <br />MR. MELROSE: It's almost as if everybody, whatever work anybody did, always comes <br />back to Karen at some point. I have just a couple of questions about it. I understand that the <br />legal descriptions, which were one of the fundamental pieces of this, were provided by Esri, <br />and approved as to the Clerk, so that that meets their requirement. So, if that is appropriate, <br />without having to go myself and look at the descriptions, I am going to trust that. I'm <br />wondering whether the Commission wants to try and make a more clear statement as a <br />Commission about things that we would like to see changed. As it is now, the only place <br />that shows up is in our personal comments attached at the end. So they reflect kind of a <br />series of individual thoughts. So I am wondering if we want to have a specific set of <br />recommendations that we, as a Commission come up with, understanding that when we do <br />that, we will probably need to have a mechanism to approve it; to put that amended piece on <br />the agenda in another meeting; whether we do that from remotely, or we sign off in some <br />form. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: For the record, I believe Karen is showing - -- <br />MR. MELROSE: Rather than whisper in my ear, let me just get my question out and then <br />maybe Karen can help answer this with Mike. My understanding is that if we do try and <br />amend this document in some way to emphasize the specific recommendations, that that <br />may require us to come back. And I'm not sure, so I would be interested in some <br />conversation on that topic. <br />M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.