My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN RDC 2011-11-30.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2011 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
MIN RDC 2011-11-30.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2011 9:09:04 AM
Creation date
12/27/2011 9:15:54 AM
Metadata
Document Relationships
MIN RDC 2011-11-30
(Original Version)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Redistricting Commission\2011 Redistricting Commission\Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I agree with the re- naming. I think that is important. I think Commissioner Middlesworth <br />has pointed this out repeatedly; so that we don't get into misunderstandings, I put my <br />suggestions in there. Since Map _40, which has long been revised, but was sort of the base <br />template that I worked from, I wrote what my thoughts were, and what went into that; <br />such as switching the mauka portion of Mauna Kea from District 1 over to District 2, <br />which I thought would be good to have it with the University and not splitting any <br />community down the middle, looking at overall regional issues of fairness and not just <br />individual communities, getting into the whole issue of not having a lop sided plan, or at <br />least the appearance of a lop sided plan that would undermine the intent of having an <br />independent Hamakua district. So, I did submit a separate sheet just on what my thoughts <br />are and what went into that original template for when you are working on the narrative <br />issue. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Thank you and thank you for your consistent hard work on this <br />process. I would like, for the record, to acknowledge that our District 8 Commissioner has <br />arrived and he is sitting there in Kona. <br />MR. KAHUI: Thank you, Madam Chairman, I appreciate that. Mahalo. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Our next testifier is Pete Lindsey, representing Hawaii Construction <br />Laborers' Union, Local 368. <br />PETE LINDSEY <br />(At this time Pete Lindsey, Field Representative Hawai` i Construction Laborers' Union Local <br />368, came forward to address members of the Commission.) <br />MR. LINDSEY: Aloha members of the Hawaii County Redistricting Commission. My <br />name is Pete Lindsey, and I am the Big Island Field Representative for the Hawaii <br />Construction Laborers' Union, Local 368. On behalf of our 500 Big Island members, and <br />retirees, especially the 150 plus that live in the Hilo area, I am testifying in support of the <br />proposed change to the boundary of District 2 and 3 in the 2011, 11. 10, Hawaii County <br />Redistricting Draft Plan. These proposed changes will create districts which will be <br />similar to the existing district, which we believe has been good for both districts. The <br />proposed change would result in District 2 maintaining a rural and residential character. <br />District 3 would maintain a transportation, light industrial, commercial, and educational <br />character. Instead of being split as it is in the present draft. The proposed changes would <br />mean that the waterfront area of downtown Hilo, Banyan Tree area, major light industrial <br />or major commercial Hilo Airport, Hilo Landfield, and U.H. Hilo will be in the same <br />district. Thank you for this opportunity to testify. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Thank you for coming in. Our next testifier is Joyce Folena, <br />representing herself. <br />JOYCE FOLENA <br />(At this time Joyce Folena came forward to address members of the Commission.) <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.