Laserfiche WebLink
<br />LEITHEAD TODD: I’m just, kind of where I’m going here is if you have, and this has been the <br />criticism from members of the public who have come forward to testify on previous applications, is <br />that if the 20-acre parcels where you designate certain activities are owned by or controlled by entities <br />that are not moving forward to do anything with those parcels, so if the ones owned by the Watamulls, <br />if the Watamulls are not developing their parcels for commercial or industrial uses, if the Association <br />which I think those parcels are supposed to be for, I think for park purposes, the ones that are owned <br />by the Association, if the Association isn’t doing anything with those parcels then you end up having a <br />demand from the community and other people within that subdivision to provide those needs for the <br />community, because it’s not happening where the plan says it’s supposed to happen. <br /> <br />The other concern I have, which I don’t know that we need to get into today, is that you have to have, <br />you know, some reasonable opportunity for people to establish religious centers, and we have to treat <br />them equally as any other application. And in this case what you have is a piece of property that has <br />an existing permit that runs with the land, albeit it says Monday to Friday and they’re talking Sunday. <br />But to me if you were looking at putting something it would seem to be better to put in on a parcel that <br />already has an existing permit, already has some existing facilities on it, rather than taking another <br />parcel that hasn’t been utilized before. I’m just, you know, kind of thinking that. And I know that it <br />might not exactly fit the master plan, but this is something that already has a permit, and a permit that <br />goes back to 1981, as well as already having a facility on it they’re asking to expand. But you had <br />some, mentioned that you said, did I hear correctly that a one-acre parcel was insufficient area for a <br />church? Did I hear that correctly? <br /> <br />REILLING: Not necessarily insufficient, except when you add the parking you’re getting awfully <br />close to other properties. And, you know, you’re encroaching, if not physically, you’re encroaching <br />noise wise just as the lady that was here on the one up Waimea. So it’s just something that they need <br />enough space for their parking and not to disturb the neighborhood with it. <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: You are aware that agriculturally zoned lots could have bulldozers and tractors <br />and husking materials and other agricultural type noises which are allowed at a higher rate than you <br />would have in residential? <br /> <br />REILLING: Yes. <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Okay. <br /> <br />REILLING: Just one quick question that I had though, you said that all of these applications run five <br />years? No? <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: No, the recent ones that we’ve done have time limits. <br /> <br />REILLING: Okay. <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: But the earlier ones that were granted many years ago run with the land and do <br />not have an expiration date. <br /> <br />9 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> <br /> <br />