Laserfiche WebLink
<br />KERN: Yeah. <br /> <br />AU: Okay. I just wanted to know why it’s going to be two months from now, about a month, well, <br />two months from now. <br /> <br />KERN: Probably a month is just too short. <br /> <br />AU: September, yeah, okay. <br /> <br />MECKLENBURG: Yeah, we need to provide the parties ample time to provide their exhibits and <br />basically make their case and as well to respond to the other party’s assertions, and also time for this <br />Commission to receive those documents ahead of time, ahead of the hearing so that you can fully <br />consider each of the party’s positions. So that’s why just kind of working ahead. It’s more feasible to <br />do it in two months, rather than the next meeting. <br /> <br />KERN: And since this is done, do we actually have to formally continue the application, the agenda <br />item? <br /> <br />DARROW: The last motion takes that -. <br /> <br />MECLENBURG: Yeah, he kind of had two parts to that, and already continuing to August, sorry, <br />th <br />October 6. So it’s already taken care of. <br /> <br />DARROW: Mr. Chairman. <br /> <br />KERN: Yes. <br /> <br />DARROW: Just for your information for everybody, the Planning Department will be sending out a <br />letter to each of the parties explaining the dates for those, for the submittal of the list, as well as the <br />time to rebuttal, and the next hearing date. Thank you. <br /> <br />KERN: Thank you very much for that. So that agenda item is pau for now. Thank you all for coming <br />up. <br /> <br />The discussion ended at 12:19 p.m. <br /> <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> Sharon M. Nomura, Secretary <br /> Windward Planning Commission <br />23 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />