Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />Mike Fischer expressed a general consensus that later on, when the time or opportunity is <br />ripe, the AC would test this issue. <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />5) Develop 2010-2011 Implementation Work Plan for SKCDP <br />6) Create Subcommittee Structure <br />In general, the AC discussed these items as one. Initially Mike Fischer stated that the AC <br />can create subcommittees later because he believed the CDP priorities would drive the <br />subcommittees. <br />Fran Tabor’s preference was to establish priorities based on region. Robin Inaba agreed <br />and wanted to gather more information which would clarify common threads and whether <br />the priorities were obtainable. She wished to set up subcommittees and establish who <br />would work in what area. <br />Achahn Schulze mentioned that certain subcommittee topics would not deal with any <br />specific community. He recommended some review of the CDP at this point because it <br />has inconsistencies. Some portions are unclear as to what is possible and what is not <br />possible. A subcommittee can talk about this. <br />Leonard Librizzi spoke for a subject focus. Selecting by region could be repetitious, for <br />example in the area of transportation. He noted that the three Waikoloa priorities Fran <br />Tabor had mentioned earlier differed from CDP priorities. For example, a main CDP <br />priority was schools. <br />Jeannie Palermo wanted to focus on priorities instead of regions. Subcommittees could be <br />developed by priorities. The CDP already exemplifies extensive community input. There <br />are many things to take on. Select a handful of priorities and stay on task, bearing <br />flexibility in mind. Jeanie asked that each member bring their top priorities to the next <br />meeting. <br />Mike Fischer advised taking care about changing the CDP priorities. Every segment of <br />the community had been reached in the earlier process. Also, the AC cannot allow a <br />small group to overrule what an entire community has already expressed. He <br />recommended regional subcommittees with some being district wide. <br />Fran Tabor wanted each community to have a specific set of AC representatives, who <br />would then bring that community’s knowledge to the AC. <br />Margaret Horwatt felt it unnecessary to go to every community meeting. Being realistic <br />meant that a real subcommittee was equivalent to community interest in the priority. <br /> <br />