Exhibit 8 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

appropriation for the software, so that we do not have to depend on the State's negotiations or timeline. 3. ESRI software a. convoluted means of accessing for commissioners /public. b. paper roads on maps are misleading, erroneous. c. included roads, subdivisions that no longer exist (i.e-, Royal Gardens buried under lava). d. did not show all roads /streets (i.e., Shower Dr. cross- streets on north side of drive), or identify all subdivision /community boundaries. e. difficult process to print a map - or a zoomed -in portion of a map. f. County had no say in contract details between Esri and State. Recommendations: The County should be the purchaser, so that it can insist on software that corrects the above problems during the negotiation process. Since the commission came in way under budget, the future amount to be appropriated for the software could take the real costs of the commission into consideration. 4. Ordinance 11 -29 a. Alternate plan requirement (2) that plan with smallest deviation get priority, irregardless of other factors. The commission received maps with extremely small deviations that were horrible in all other respects. b. Maximum Council District Deviation (b) states that "if practicable", allowance for future growth based on past trends (which may not continue Into the future and is therefore rather nebulous compared with definitive criteria like road connectivity) be given the lowest deviation. Yet the preponderance of testimony received from the Puna residents demanded that this be ignored and the Puna population for both new Puna districts be as high as possible, or even exceeded, so that Puna residents not be disenfranchised by being 'represented' by a Hilo councilperson. There is a historical basis for this overriding sentiment. c. Maximum Council District Deviation (a): limitation to 4.9996 deviation per district as an overriding mandated priority no matter what, and despite public input that keeping communities together should be