My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-01-09 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Property Management Division
>
Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission
>
Commission Meeting Information
>
Minutes
>
2005 - 2024
>
2012
>
2012-01-09 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2012 12:56:53 PM
Creation date
4/10/2012 12:56:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Van Bergen asked when HILT acquires land in fee are there deed restrictions. Mr. Bonar replied <br />that if there are grant monies involved in the acquisition <br />and requirements and typically HILT will provide a conservation easement to the state or county. <br />Should HILT become incapable of managing these lands or wish to transfer to another non-profit then <br />both the county and the state has to approve the transfer or the land will revert back to them. <br /> <br />Ms. Matsumura then asked that if all fails and the property reverts to the state or county, would they be <br />able to sell it to a developer. Mr. Bonar replied that if and/or state or <br />county, you have eminent domain, so technically, yes. <br /> <br />Ms. Byrne Baber asked if you could put any legal restrictions on the property. Mr. Van Bergen replied <br />that it would have to go to County Council for approval. Mr. Bonar replied that any restriction that <br />HILT puts on a senior jurisdiction would have to approve. <br /> <br />Mr. Bonar added that if you put a conservation easement on your land it places permanent restrictions <br />on the land and the landowner gives up some/all developmental rights. There are also tax benefits <br />ILT will monitor annually to ensure compliance with terms of <br />easement and enforce as necessary. <br /> <br />Ms. Britt then talked about the flexibility of conservation easements and how they are specific for each <br />ion <br />landowner. <br /> <br />Ms. Nicholson asked what happens when the conservation value changes; for instance, a lava flow <br />wipes out a forest that was a nesting site. Ms. Britt replied that i <br />really not much you can do about that. <br />no need for the easement. There are provisions that would allow you to <br /> <br /> <br />Ms. Britt talked about how conservation easements conserve agricultural lands, restore the ecological <br />integrity and provide public access. They are far less expensive than fee acquisition, promote private <br />land conservation and provide opportunities for cooperative partnerships among private landowners, <br />conservation groups and government agencies including the County. <br /> <br />also a stewardship fund to maintain the lands so before a <br />property/easement is acquired they calculate how much it will cost to monitor and maintain once <br />acquired if the landowner cannot come up with the extra money. <br /> <br />Mr. Hirakami commented that there seems to be a conflict between the slides, one says that a <br />conservation easement does not provide public access but another says otherwise. Ms. Britt replied <br />that they are flexible documents and if the easement would be for access then that would be the <br />primary purpose versus an easement designated for agriculture that would restrict public access. <br /> <br /> <br />- 2 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.