My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-01-09 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Property Management Division
>
Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission
>
Commission Meeting Information
>
Minutes
>
2005 - 2024
>
2012
>
2012-01-09 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2012 12:56:53 PM
Creation date
4/10/2012 12:56:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />STATEMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON AGENDA ITEMS <br /> <br />JOHN REPLOGLE <br /> <br />talked about an agricultural conservation easement that was done by <br /> He talked about how TNC did the baseline work (marked the boundaries, fence lines <br />and took photographs from different locations within the property). Within the easement the <br />landowner specified two sites where buildings could take place (homes or farm buildings) and a good <br />chunk of native forest on the top where an access easement could be granted to hunters to access the <br />forest. The state recently hired someone that is going to work on access issues and look into how they <br />can work with landowners regarding conservation easements. <br /> <br />example would be the County-owned lands. He feels that the County should put a <br />conse <br />into homes and the numbers of buildings and infrastructure could be limited. This would give the <br />properties a more realistic value. <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br /> <br />Ms. Matsumura stated that we deferred approval of the October 10, 2011 minutes to clarify what was <br />discussed. Ms. Kelepolo noted that the recording reflected what was said in the minutes. <br /> <br />Mr. Hirakami then asked that page 4 of the minutes be revised to read: Mr. Hirakami asked Mr. <br />Brilhante if the report to the Mayor should be made available to the public. Mr. Brilhante replied that <br />this report does not include any decision m <br />up a rule, regulation or resolution. <br /> <br />Motion: Commissioner Markovich moved to approve the minutes of October 10, 2011 as <br />amended. Seconded by Commissioner Nicholson; all members voted aye, motion carried. <br /> <br />Ms. Matsumura asked if there were any changes to the minutes of November 14, 2011. <br /> <br />Motion: Commissioner Nicholson moved to approve the minutes of November 14, 2011. <br />Seconded by Commissioner Freire; all members voted aye, motion carried. <br /> <br />WRITTEN COMMUNICATION <br /> <br />Communication No. 12-001: Letter dated December 7, 2011 from Dale Bonar, Executive Director, <br />conservation easement request withdrawn from consideration by the Commission <br /> <br />Ms. Matsumura asked Ms. Self as to whether they can include a communication that was sent to Ms. <br />th <br />Kelepolo by e-mail on January 8from Mr. Charles Flaherty. Ms. Self replied yes. <br /> <br /> <br />- 4 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.