My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-01-09 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Property Management Division
>
Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission
>
Commission Meeting Information
>
Minutes
>
2005 - 2024
>
2012
>
2012-01-09 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2012 12:56:53 PM
Creation date
4/10/2012 12:56:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Commission <br /> <br />Ms. Self said she had nothing to report but understand that there was some questions asked of Mr. <br />Brilhante at the October meeting. She added that the sunshine law training scheduled for today will be <br />moved to another meeting since all members are not present. <br /> <br /> Deputy Corporation Counsel Amy Self to discuss with the Commission the possibility of <br />recommending conservation easements rather than fee purchase and whether it can be <br /> <br /> <br />Ms. Self told the Commission that after reviewing the County Code, a conservation easement would be <br />ings conservation easement that came <br />begin negotiations f <br />Code <br /> <br />Ms. Matsumura stated that when the nomination form comes in, the Commission considers <br />written. She asked Ms. Self if it would be her opinion that the Commission alters <br />role the County has then the Commission can ask the applicant questions or make arrangements to <br />come to a meeting and explain in detail. <br /> <br />granting source. There are County funds that are set up like that which is similar to the State, LLCP. <br /> <br />Ms. Matsumura then stated that for purposes of this agenda item can this be included into the <br /> because <br />t you normally do when reviewing the suggestion forms. <br /> <br />Mr. Hirakami <br />ervue. Ms. Self told Mr. Hirakami that if you want to discuss that it <br />would need to be listed as an agenda item at another meeting. <br /> <br />Ms. Nicholson stated that she is not clear and needed clarification in regards to conservation easements <br />and asked Ms. Self in regards to entitlement, would the County have to control the easement. Ms. Self <br />replied that the County gets a lot of grant of easements for various purposes and on the document the <br />grantor is the fee simple owner of the property and the grantee is the County and we have an interest in <br />ame. Ms. Nicholson asked if we could have a co-responsibility possibly <br />. A <br />management plan and partnership for land management could then be worked out with the co- <br />applicants. <br />- 6 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.