Laserfiche WebLink
4.0 RECYCLING, BIOCONVERSION, AND MARKETS <br />4.5.2.1 Multi- Stream Recycling <br />With multi- stream systems, households place recyclables into rectangular containers, bags, <br />or bundles and place them at the curb. The collector lifts materials by hand into multiple <br />compartments on the collection vehicle. Glass is often separated from other materials in <br />order to avoid high contamination of fiber and fiber processing difficulties that can result <br />when broken glass is present. Most programs sort materials into two or three types of <br />commodities, but five to seven materials sorts are done in some programs. <br />Advantages <br />• More thoroughly separating differing types of materials generally results in higher <br />recycled material quality and market prices. <br />Can reinforce zero waste principles by raising consumer awareness that sorted materials <br />are valuable resources. <br />Disadvantages <br />• Requires more effort by householders to sort materials. <br />• Requires a higher level of effort by haulers, resulting in higher collection costs. <br />4.5.2.2 Single- Stream Recycling <br />In recent years, there has been a movement towards single- stream recycling systems in <br />which all dry recyclables are placed into a single rolling carte. The cart is lifted using a <br />hydraulic lifting arm attached to a collection vehicle. This more automated type of system <br />lowers collection costs. The lowest cost per ton of material recycled is typically achieved by <br />single stream recycling with fully automated collection in which a single driver can collect <br />material from many stops without leaving the cab of the truck (see photo below). <br />Advantages <br />• Generally results in the highest rate of <br />diversion of materials from landfill. <br />• Simpler system for participants to use because <br />all materials are combined in a single bin and <br />no sorting is necessary. <br />• Lower cost per ton of material recycled <br />because of higher resident participation rates <br />combined with automated collection efficiency <br />(lower collection costs). <br />• Results in fewer injuries to collection workers and corresponding workers compensation <br />claims because no lifting or handling of materials is required. <br />Disadvantages <br />• Higher contamination of recyclables: significant effort is required to ensure that <br />residents maintain material quality. <br />2 MSW Management Magazine (July /August 2007) reports the results of a 2005 study that indicated single stream collection <br />was used in 27 percent of U.S. recycling programs in 2005 compared with 10 percent in 2000. <br />December 2009 4 -13 <br />