My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Integrated Resources & Solid Waste Management Plan Update - Dec 2009
PublicDocuments
>
Environmental Management
>
Solid Waste Documents
>
Outdated-Obsolete files
>
Integrated Resources & Solid Waste Management Plan Update - Dec 2009
>
Integrated Resources & Solid Waste Management Plan Update - Dec 2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2012 9:36:28 AM
Creation date
6/19/2012 3:36:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.0 RECYCLING, BIOCONVERSION, AND MARKETS <br />4.5.5 Source Separation Ordinance (Mandatory Recycling) and/or <br />Disposal Bans with Differential Tip Fees <br />A growing number of local governments are adopting policies and legislation that prohibit <br />disposal of recyclable products and /or mandate source separation and /or recycling of those <br />materials. For example, in January 2006, the City of Seattle, Washington, began enforcing a <br />policy that all waste generators recycle. As a result of this policy, residents can lose pickup <br />services temporarily if their garbage contains more than 10- percent recyclable materials. <br />Once recycling opportunities for select materials are in place, some policies the County <br />could consider include the following: <br />• Require residents and businesses to participate in recycling and composting programs. <br />An ordinance could be developed that either requires residents and businesses to <br />source - separate recyclables, or bans the combination of designated recyclable or <br />compostable materials with the garbage. <br />• Ban readily - recyclable and reusable materials and products from landfills and /or any <br />future energy from waste facility. <br />Ban single -use disposable products from public events and festivals and as many other <br />places as possible. <br />A good discussion of mandatory recycling policies recently prepared by Portland Metro <br />(Oregon) 12 included the following lessons learned from communities that have <br />implemented such policies: <br />• Required recycling programs have the potential to divert a significant portion of the <br />waste stream and help communities meet recovery goals. <br />• Education and technical assistance are key factors to the implementation of mandatory <br />recycling requirements. Virtually all of the program managers stressed the importance <br />of education as a key element to a successful program. <br />• Using a cooperative approach with haulers, business owners, and community <br />organizations can build program support for required recycling and influence <br />participation. <br />• Strong commodity markets ultimately determine what is recyclable and influence <br />participation. It is not practical to mandate materials recycling unless the markets exist <br />for the materials. Therefore, any program mandating recycling should only include <br />recyclables with developed and stable markets in order to avoid having to change <br />policies in the future. <br />• A number of programs require the recycling of materials for which the cost of recycling <br />is less than or equal to the costs of proper disposal at a solid waste facility. <br />12 Required Recycling and Incentive Program Survey, Summary of Findings. 2002. Portland Metro Regional Environmental <br />Management Department. <br />December 2009 4 -21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.