My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Appendices to Integrated Resources & Solid Waste Management Plan - Dec 2009
PublicDocuments
>
Environmental Management
>
Solid Waste Documents
>
Outdated-Obsolete files
>
Integrated Resources & Solid Waste Management Plan Update - Dec 2009
>
Appendices to Integrated Resources & Solid Waste Management Plan - Dec 2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2012 9:02:52 AM
Creation date
6/19/2012 3:52:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT D SAMPLING METHODOLOGY AND CALCULATIONS <br />2. Generator type <br />a. Commercially hauled loads only <br />i. Loads that were 80% or more residential waste were recorded as "residential" <br />ii. Loads that were 80% or more commercial waste were recorded as "commercial" <br />iii. Otherwise, the generator type was recorded as "mixed" <br />b. Transfer station loads only - always marked as "mixed" <br />3. Vehicle type <br />a. Commercially hauled loads only - recorded as "packer," "roll -off," or "other vehicle" <br />(e.g. flatbeds, dump trucks, pickups). <br />b. Transfer station loads only - were always recorded as "transfer station box." <br />As the load was emptied at the West Hawaii Landfill, the Field Supervisor observed the <br />load for evidence of hard -to- process or potentially explosive items. Details regarding these <br />items were noted on the sample's waste sort sheet. Hard -to- process items included anything <br />that would be difficult or impossible to manually sort, automatically process, or transfer by <br />conveyor belt due to weight or size, such as: appliances, mattresses, cabinets, carpet, asphalt <br />or concrete, and large pieces of scrap metal or lumber. <br />Next, the selected load was visually divided into an imaginary 16 -cell grid. The supervisor <br />then identified the randomly selected cell and approximately 200 to 300 pounds of waste <br />was removed from that cell with a loader and placed on a tarpaulin. Samples were then <br />tagged with a sample identifier labeled with their unique sample number and the date. <br />Once the total weight of a sample was recorded, the material was sorted by hand into the 58 <br />prescribed components, placed in plastic laundry baskets, weighed, and recorded. (See <br />Attachment C for a list and definitions of the components.) <br />Each sample was sorted by hand to the greatest reasonable level of detail, until no more <br />than a small amount of homogeneous fines (less than 1 square inch) remained. The goal was <br />to sort each sample completely into component categories. However, if fines did remain <br />after sorting, they were weighed and the Supervisor classified them as "mixed residue." <br />As the final step in collecting field data, the Supervisor reviewed, completed and organized <br />the forms from each day's sampling activity. The Supervisor also prepared data summary <br />sheets and sampling checklists at the end of each day. Completed data forms were then <br />transmitted to the Project Manager at CH2M HILL for review and quality control prior to <br />data entry. <br />Waste Composition Calculations <br />The composition estimates represent the ratio of the components' weight to the total waste <br />for each noted substream. They are derived by summing each component's weight across all <br />of the selected records and dividing by the sum of the total weight of waste, as shown in the <br />following equation: <br />APPX B WASTE COMPOSITION REPORT 121709.DOC D -3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.