My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-05-03 Windward Transcript John Hegarty
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2012
>
2012-05-03 Windward Transcript John Hegarty
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2012 8:30:58 AM
Creation date
6/29/2012 8:30:54 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
reasons why I asked Mr. Galimba there whether you guys were going to do future commercial development <br />there, which is not. And I think that, that’s, you know, the choice of the subdivision there to make it more of a <br />community benefit in those types of ways. <br /> <br />The other challenge that I’ve seen is, great, you know, we have, let’s say the General Plan allowed for some <br />expansion there. It doesn’t mean the owners actually are going to do something with it. We see that in HPP. <br />There are some large parcels there with the boundary around it, but there’s nothing happening. And so it’s <br />challenging to find an area where the land use pattern and the person who owns the land are in alignment. Does <br />that make sense? A lot of times, you know, it would be great. You could do it there but the owner doesn’t want <br />to do it. And so right here we’re at this impasse. <br /> <br />I would personally like to see it get approved with some strict conditions on there, one of them which would be <br />no alcohol and potentially a right-turn and, right-turn in off of Ainaloa, right turn out off of Ainaloa, with maybe <br />th <br />a little bit of improvement to 37 to get the traffic off of Ainaloa and then pulling in there. And obviously that <br />would lead to some additional costs to Mr. Hegarty but it might mitigate some of the concerns. And, again, land <br />use is not always a win-win. Many times it’s not. And so when that comes we sometimes create a lose-lose to <br />create a win-win, if that makes sense. It’s very, very challenging. And I think it’s something that we can do to <br />mitigate traffic on 130. And it’s a huge concern. I personally lost a friend of mine on 130 that passed away <br />from that highway. And so that’s my take on it. If I could get any other feedback or potentially a -. <br /> <br />GONZALES: I’d like to ask -. <br /> <br />KERN: Commissioner Gonzales. <br /> <br />GONZALES: If I could. <br /> <br />KERN: Yes. Mr. Hegarty, come up, please. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Thank you. You know, I’m a business man, too. I just, I mean honestly can you, do you think <br />you can survive without selling alcohol? Is that something that you’re willing to -? <br /> <br />HEGARTY: Definitely. <br /> <br />GONZALES: You can get by on that? <br /> <br />HEGARTY: Yes, I can. <br /> <br />GONZALES: I mean you’d be all right with that kind of a restriction? <br /> <br />HEGARTY: And I’ll be more than willing to do that. I don’t want to see a bunch of drunks running around the <br />place either. But at the same time if you stop and look at it realistically men and women work extremely hard <br />during the week, they go home and they might want to have a glass of beer or glass of wine with their spouse. I <br />mean who are we to deny them? <br /> <br />GONZALES: Oh, I understand that -. <br /> <br />HEGARTY: Okay. <br /> <br />GONZALES: You know, I might have had a beer once or twice. <br /> <br />HEGARTY: Yeah. But we could do that, yes. <br /> 14 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.