Laserfiche WebLink
In 2010 a site inspection was done by a zoning inspector within the Planning Department. During the <br />inspection it was noted there were numerous structures on the property. A request was made or an <br />order was made from the Planning Department to the Applicant to supply a survey of the property <br />done by a licensed survey and identify all existing structures and what they were. This is the survey <br />map that was submitted by the Applicant. Again, the different color codes identify the different types <br />of structures. Zooming in on this survey map, this is the mauka portion of the property. The red <br />structures, again, are dwelling structures. They’re identified as faculty staff housing or student bunk <br />housing. You have one, two, three, four, five, six, seven identified on the site plan. It’s my <br />understanding that this particular dwelling which is encroaching on State land adjacent to the property <br />has been removed. <br /> <br />Additionally, we have pink structures which are accessory type structures. We have a shed, carport; <br />the blue structure is a greenhouse. And as you’ll note there are numerous water catchment tanks on the <br />property as well. This is the makai portion of the property. The only structure identified from the <br />previous map is this particular structure. Previously we had seven identified dwellings. This would be <br />eight, nine, ten. Additionally we have accessory structures. This is a bathroom, workshop type <br />structure. This is identified as a kitchen, the storage tent, and another shed. The green is the <br />performing arts/educational center which is constructed at this time. <br /> <br />This is the building permit records for the property. It identifies that the Applicant or there were, it <br />identifies what structures are on the subject property. <br /> <br />In 1995 and in 1998 the Applicant had received building permits for four dwellings. Two in ’95, two <br />in ’98. Additionally, there were two additions done to these existing dwellings. There were several <br />other structures constructed on the property, a garage storage, a greenhouse, and a shed. Up above <br />you’ll notice the same identification of the shed, but it’s in parenthesis. That means that it has been <br />demolished. So the shed is actually not on the property or permitted. And, lastly we have the <br />performing arts/training pavilion. Currently four of these structures are closed. Several are still open <br />as far as building permits. <br /> <br />This is an aerial photo of the subject property. Again, it’s just identifying the different structures on <br />the property. This, this line right here is not completely accurate because the view of the photo is at an <br />angle and not overhead. We have the performing arts facility down on the makai side of the portion, <br />property. <br /> <br />Here are several photos that were taken during the site inspection done by our zoning inspector. It’s <br />unclear as to whether or not these are the permitted or unpermitted, although we do know this is the <br />performing arts educational center which is permitted. This is a side view of that structure, and <br />another side view. I’ll just run through these. These are all, whether they’re dwellings or, or sheds, or <br />structures, it’s unclear at this point. This particular photo shows one side of this structure. This is a <br />carport structure. This is the other side of that structure that was located behind that carport structure. <br /> <br />Non-compliance of Condition No. 5. Condition No. 5 states, “No public performances shall be <br />allowed on the subject property.” Condition No. 5 reflected the representation of the Applicant that <br />they would not be presenting public performances in the building, but that it would be used solely for <br /> 5 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> <br /> <br />