Laserfiche WebLink
GIFFIN: Yes. <br /> <br />ARAI: It did speak to access from Kuakini being limited to right-in/right-out only; that was based <br />on the original design concept for the proposed project. Previously, the proposed building was <br />located closer to Palani Road, and that would have allowed for facilitated ingress and egress right- <br />turns only onto Kuakini; however, discussions with the Design Commission and discussions with <br />our office and Public Works, they elected to move the building back to the north. And as you can <br />see, this would be the access aisle for the drive-through. So what that now does is basically blocks <br />off facilitated right-in and right-out movements from this intersection, and that’s why you see the <br />single arrow showing right-out only; because if cars were to try to come in here, it would basically <br />get tangled up with the queue for the drive-through. So I think based on the current design, it would <br />therefore restrict it to right-outs only onto Kuakini, even though the condition continues to provide <br />that option. But that being said, everything must meet with the approval of the Department of <br />Public Works. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Yes, yes, yes. And so then according to what we see here, and I think that Commissioner <br />Whittemore was also concerned about the traffic flow, the in and out then, right-in right-out, would <br />only be on Kuakini. <br /> <br />ARAI: There would be no right-in from Kuakini based on the current design concept, because <br />right-in will create a conflict with the queue in the drive-through. Again, as you can see, if a car <br />were to come into the property, it will tangle up with the traffic in the queue for the drive-through. <br />So the applicant is currently showing only right-out. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Okay. <br /> <br />ARAI: Mr. Emler is in the audience; we brought him back. So if you want to direct any specific <br />questions to him -. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Okay. Ki, are you familiar with the letter from the Kona Traffic Safety Committee, which <br />raised the question of access to the subject property? Mr. Gimpel testified earlier in that regard, and <br />so that is the issue we are discussing right now, Ki. <br /> <br />EMLER: I’m sorry, Madam Chairwoman, I didn’t -. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Take a minute. It doesn’t matter. <br /> <br />EMLER: Yeah, get a chance to read this yet. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Sure, go ahead. <br /> <br />EMLER: Okay. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: And then Daryn directed us to Condition No. 6 on Page 7 of the recommendation, which <br />speaks to in and out. Are you familiar with the letter from the Department of Public Works that I <br />referenced, dated April 19, Item No. 2 under Roadways also referring to right-in right-out only? <br /> <br />S. LEE: (Inaudible) <br /> <br />6 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />