My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-06-23 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-06-23 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2012 8:40:09 AM
Creation date
8/13/2012 1:53:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Rowe asked whether Mr. Takahashi thought about surveying the <br /> County employees to check how well they've done, and also doing a community <br /> survey. What that would do is give them a more validated response that's not <br /> just by Board members but people within who they work with and people that <br /> they are supposed to be serving. For him personally, he feels Mr. Takahashi is <br /> doing a great job, but it's about not him, it's about the perception of the <br /> community. <br /> Mr. Takahashi responded that he'll give it some thought. <br /> Mr. De Lima commented that Mr. Takahashi is the right person for the <br /> job. His comment has nothing to do with Mr. Takahashi, but he believes there <br /> needs to be a more formal evaluation process. It involves Mr. Takahashi self- <br /> critiquing himself, and it should be something that all the cabinet members <br /> utilize. The State of Hawaii has its own evaluation system for their department <br /> heads, and the EUTF uses an evaluation for its own director. Between now and <br /> the next evaluation process, the Board should agendize this matter for <br /> subsequent meetings early in Mr. Takahashi's term to develop a formal process <br /> of evaluation to use next year. It would be a helpful tool for Mr. Takahashi as <br /> well as his team. <br /> Mr. Takahashi will obtain the different evaluation forms noted above that <br /> may be available for information. <br /> Vice Chair Yoshiyama noted that counsel pointed out the director's <br /> evaluation is on a fiscal year basis and not on the calendar year. Knowing the <br /> item was coming up at this meeting, he had met with Mr. Takahashi, and they <br /> talked about the past evaluation processes. Mr. Takahashi had suggested that <br /> they ask someone from the administration to talk to the MAB, and while it's not <br /> a substitute for a good evaluation process, that would at least give them some <br /> feedback. <br /> Thus, as everyone is in agreement, they will agendize this matter for the <br /> next meeting. <br /> MOTION: Mr. De Lima moved to place on the record that <br /> Mr. Takahashi has done an exemplary job as the director, <br /> there are no reservations about his performance, and that in <br /> accordance with Rule 100-11 of the Rules of the Civil Service <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.