Laserfiche WebLink
with their counterparts in all the other jurisdictions and negotiate like they have <br />done before where the HR directors represent the various executive officers. <br />They are now working on setting meetings with the one remaining union, the <br />United Public Workers. <br />2) The department wasn't asked to cut a specific percentage from its <br />budget, but they were asked to cut as much as they could. Therefore, in that <br />process, the department trimmed its proposed budget for the next fiscal year by <br />10 %, which amounted to approximately $200,000. The 10% cut was from the <br />department's total budget as opposed to this current budget where they were <br />asked to cut 10% of their operating costs. The cut is a significant amount and <br />leaves the department with a "bare- bones" budget given the fact that about 76% <br />of the total budget is for salaries and wages. <br />The biggest item that was reduced came from money allotted to the equal <br />opportunity officer to make modifications. That budget was originally $100,000, <br />but the court order was a minimum of $50,000, so they went with what the court <br />ordered and reduced it by $50,000. <br />The other big money item was the advertising budget of $90,000, which <br />they reduced. They will continue to fill key, essential positions such as Fire and <br />Police, but as they are on a restricted hiring order from the administration, they <br />don't expect to be filling that many positions. <br />The travel account was cut by $15,000 or $20,000, although that may be <br />difficult with collective bargaining proposals coming up. The other cuts were <br />small amounts taken from different accounts. The 10% cut did not include the <br />workers' comp budget. <br />3) The personnel evaluation committee has completed all interviews <br />with departments and are finalizing their recommendations to the Mayor. <br />4) The Board had noted, at the last meeting, the increase in accidents <br />from Fire and Police in 2005 and 2006 on the report from Ms. Kamaka, and the <br />Board inquired into that. Ms. Kamaka found that there were no external <br />factors on why the numbers increased. Basically, she found that those accidents <br />were pure carelessness on the part of the drivers. More importantly, as her <br />report states, Fire and Police now have effective programs in place, and that's <br />why in 2008 and 2009 there was a tremendous drop in the number of accidents. <br />Police are now taking sterner action against police officers who are careless and <br />6 <br />