My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-07-19 Leeward Exh B - Bill No. 255
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2012
>
2012-07-19 Leeward Exh B - Bill No. 255
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2012 1:40:26 PM
Creation date
8/16/2012 1:40:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
zoned Agricultural-1 acre as indicated by the green color and Single Family Residential indicated <br />by the mustard color. Again, those properties zoned Commercial is indicated here in pink. <br /> <br />This is an aerial photo of the property. As you can see, the park site is, Greenwell Park is located <br />here adjacent to the subject property, Yano Hall located there, and across the highway is the <br />Manago Hotel. The subject property itself is outlined in a black border. The redline you see going <br />through the property is the separation of the zoning district boundary. If I would back up quickly, <br />back in 1979 this property did undergo a change of zone, but only for the mauka portion, mauka of <br />the red line; the Commercial zone area along the highway was already in existence. So in 1979 <br />there was a subsequent rezoning to rezone the mauka half of the subject property to a Commercial <br />zoning consistent with that which already existed along the highway. <br /> <br />As you can see on this particular map, this is the State Land Use Boundary Map. It shows the entire <br />property within the State Land Use Urban District as indicated in the pink color. Areas indicated in <br />the green are State Land Use agriculturally designated lands. This is our General Plan Land Use <br />Pattern Allocation Guide Map. It is in an area designated for Low Density residential uses as <br />indicated by the yellow color. Medium Density Urban uses, which also accommodate multiple <br />family and commercial uses, are indicated here in orange. Also, note that the LUPAG Map is a <br />broad brush representation of the land use policies for the County. This is the Kona Community <br />Development Plan Map. The subject property is located somewhere around there – if I can get my <br />pointer to shoot correctly. It is within a Rural Town TOD and there are no concurrency <br />requirements for a Rural Town TOD, with the exception that that does encourage establishment of <br />TOD master plans to guide the redevelopment of these Rural Towns. <br /> <br />Bill 255 submitted by the Council attempts to delete Condition E in order to remove a restriction <br />within the ordinance that currently limits uses on this Neighborhood Commercial zone property <br />only to a visitor center and its directly related uses. Condition E currently states, “This amendment <br />to change the district classification of property is limited to a visitor center and related and <br />accessory uses of a visitor center in substantial conformance to the description in the current <br />application” – submitted back in 2008 – “for reasons of public health, safety, and welfare due to <br />flood hazards in the area.” When in 2008 there was an attempt by the Amy B.H. Greenwell <br />Ethnobotanical Garden to amend the mauka half of the property, as I previously mentioned, and that <br />was to accommodate a visitor center, during the course of hearings before the Planning Commission <br />and ultimately at the County Council, the Council was concerned about potential flooding issues or <br />drainage issues in a particular area. That being said, they saw it fit to incorporate this condition, <br />which basically restricted uses to no more than a visitor center. <br /> <br />This is a photograph of the affected area. This is an unnamed County road running basically <br />mauka-makai, and we are looking makai with Manago Hotel in the background. The subject <br />property is off to your right from this unnamed County road. And note the condition of the County <br />road itself. This is looking back mauka along the same unnamed County road with the subject <br />property off to your left. This is a view of the Ethnobotanical Center with the visitor center located <br />to the right of the screen, and you may notice the paved circular driveway servicing the center. And <br />again, this is a photograph of the visitor center itself. <br /> <br />When we considered Bill 255, by eliminating Condition E, what that basically does is then allow all <br />uses permitted within the CN zone district to occur on the subject property, regardless if the center <br />is only envisioning nothing more than a visitor center and a farmers’ market, which has been the <br />2 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.