Laserfiche WebLink
education center and a biweekly farmers’ market, then you will be subject to all the standard <br />commercial improvements that we normally require of anyone else. So I guess what I’m basically <br />saying is you’ll be, should this amendment be approved by the County Council, you will be limited <br />to those two uses, nothing more. <br /> <br />VAN DYKE: Okay. <br /> <br />ARAI: And if you want to contemplate something much grander, then that should have been <br />considered before Bill 255 was submitted down to this office. But as it stands, the proposed <br />revision is what was offered to us; there was no real detailed explanation on what else was coming. <br />We had to glean through the records that everything was being promulgated by the desire of the <br />community to have a, to re-establish the farmers’ market on the property. So that’s what we knew <br />and that’s what we try to accommodate. <br /> <br />VAN DYKE: Okay, thank you. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Commissioners, any questions? I have a question, comment, or something, in regards, <br />say, the Boy Scouts. Would that be ancillary use to the visitor center, if the Boy Scouts came, that <br />kind of thing? I mean, what’s ancillary to the visitor center? Cause I think that’s a question. <br /> <br />ARAI: The visitor center is, the way I understand it, educational. A lot of what’s occurring on the <br />property is educational. If there is some sort of activity that is promoting the direct operations of <br />the visitor education center, then that is maybe something we can consider as ancillary and <br />supportive, or related, to the operations of the visitor education center. Something like, if the Boy <br />Scouts were to hold a bake sale or a fundraiser to support the operations of the visitor center, that’s <br />fine; but if they hold a makahiki or some other type of event that has no direct bearing on the <br />operations of the visitor center or the Greenwell Botanical Garden, then I would think that would be <br />in conflict with the code. I just see no relationship. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Thank you. But that doesn’t preclude them from holding, like, you have your Amy <br />Botanical Days; so they could have one of those in addition to the biweekly markets, right? <br />Because that’s, again, totally for the visitor center. I’m just trying to clarify. Say, they had a ‘ulu <br />festival that was ancillary to the visitor center. <br /> <br />ARAI: You know, I try to think that the Department prides itself on being reasonable, so I would <br />think that, you know, it really depends; I mean, I don’t think we are going to come across and be <br />unreasonable on how we review things. But, you know, it’s hard for me to pass judgment without <br />sitting down because -. Understand that the Planning Director is trying to accommodate the desires <br />of the community but is also very aware of the concerns affecting the area – one of them being <br />drainage, the other one clearly being traffic. So that is always in the back of our mind. And we do <br />have a fiducially responsibility to make sure that whatever is being offered remains consistent with <br />the intent of what’s being offered through this bill, but not compromise the purpose of our zoning <br />requirements, which would normally, as I mentioned before, require that roadways in the area and <br />drainage system be improved to commercial standards. So if you want free liberty to do whatever <br />you want within the Commercial zone district, then we are going to expect all the improvements to <br />be put in first. <br /> <br />8 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />