Laserfiche WebLink
and leachate management issues made design and permitting of a landfill expansion <br />impractical and uneconomical. <br />o Based on the updated and refined planning level cost estimates, long - hauling from SHSL to <br />WHSL was a potentially feasible and more cost - effective disposal alternative. <br />On January 27, 2012, the SWD initiated a long -haul pilot study between East Hawaii and the <br />WHSL. <br />• The purpose of the study was to field test the hauling assumptions and verify the planning -level <br />cost estimates presented in the HLFS report. <br />• The intent was to collect a sufficient amount of data on a short -term basis and it was <br />determined that 3 months was an adequate amount of time to field test the hauling <br />assumptions. <br />• Annual cost -range comparisons of the 3 solid waste alternatives: <br />• Waste -to- Energy: $80 to $210 /ton <br />• New Hilo Landfill: $92 to $110 /ton <br />• Hauling to WHSL: $52 to $71 /ton <br />• Details of the study, including procedures, summary of data (to include performance data, <br />estimated study cost and annual projected cost data), along with discussion and conclusions are <br />available on line at the County of Hawai'i, DEM /SWD website: <br />http: // records .co.hawaii.hi.us /weblink/Browse aspx ?startid= 61384 &dbid =l <br />• Goodale explained the definition of "avoided cost" as it was used in the report. <br />• Christine Dochin, a member of the last Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAG), <br />clarified that the 2009 IRSWMP did not recommend that WTE proposals be set aside <br />and the report will be revised to reflect this. <br />• The money that will be paid by HELCO to purchase electricity from the WTE facility was part <br />of the evaluation that was done as part of the Request for Proposal (RFP). <br />• Overtime was factored in. <br />• The cost for the physical closure of the SHSL has been estimated at between $18 and <br />$20 million. The post closure monitoring costs have not been calculated. <br />• The SWD is required to monitor and maintain the closed landfill site for at least 30 years <br />according to Federal and State regulations. This includes groundwater monitoring, gas <br />monitoring, monitoring and maintenance of liner systems, monitoring and maintenance of any <br />stormwater runoff systems and general grounds maintenance. <br />• The 2009 IRSWMP attempts to look at various management options for a specific period of <br />time. Within this report, the recommendation was to further evaluate the option of landfill <br />expansion and trucking. It recommended looking at WTE in the next planning period if it <br />made sense for the County to do so. The County does not have a plan that looks beyond the <br />IRSWMP at this time. <br />• Goodale estimated that the life of the SHSL is approximately 8 years and the life of the WHSL <br />is approximately 30 years. There is the potential for significantly greater lifespan if the <br />supbgrade at WHSL was lowered and if the County chose to pursue sue of the land on the east <br />side of the existing site. <br />• This report will be presented to the County Council at its August 14, 2012 meeting. <br />7. NEW BUSINESS <br />Presentation by Pacific Biodiesel relating to their facility and operations (attached to original <br />minutes) <br />- Jenna Long provided the following information: <br />o Pacific Biodiesel was started in 1996 and was the first biodiesel station in the United States <br />o Description of Biodiesel: what it is; what it is not <br />