My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-09-11 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Kailua Village Design Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2024
>
2012
>
2012-09-11 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2012 2:19:07 PM
Creation date
9/26/2012 2:19:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Childs oriented the Commissioners regarding the subject and surrounding properties on the <br />location map, site plan and photographs, and described the proposed project. He noted that the <br />proposal appeared to comply with the architectural design guidelines for the Kailua Village. <br /> <br />Commissioner Broderson expressed his concern over the project’s impact on a lone plumeria tree <br />that is flourishing in the proposed construction area, and said that he would want the tree to be kept <br />and maintained, especially since the landscaping has been minimized in this commercial property. <br />Mr. Peter Piper, the applicant, introduced himself, and said that the structural design is still in <br />progress, that the location of the bridge posts may change, and that if the final location affects the <br />tree, they will transplant it somewhere close by. In response to the Chair’s question, he verified that <br />the proposed colors would match the existing color scheme of the Humpy’s Big Island Alehouse <br />building. <br /> <br />It was moved by Commissioner Hetherington, and seconded by Commissioner Burns, to <br />recommend approval of the proposed project as submitted, provided that the existing landscaping be <br />preserved, through relocation if necessary, and maintained consistent with the original landscaping <br />plan. A roll call vote was taken and the motion carried with five ayes (Hetherington, Burns, <br />Broderson, Stanbro and Kitchens) and three absent and excused (Andreae, Au Hoy and Herbert). <br /> <br />2. Design Review of a proposed addition to the Customer Service Building for Hawaii <br />Electric Light Company. Applicant: Fleming and Associates, LLC. Landowner: Hawaii <br />Electric Light Company. Property Tax Map Key No.: 7-4-010:022. Location: 74-5519 <br />Kaiwi Street, Kailua-Kona. <br /> <br />3. Design Review of a proposed 12,000 square foot warehouse building for Hawaii Electric <br />Light Company. Applicant: Fleming and Associates, LLC. Landowner: Hawaii Electric <br />Light Company. Property Tax Map Key No.: 7-4-010:022. Location: 74-5519 Kaiwi <br />Street, Kailua-Kona. <br /> <br />With the Chair’s permission, Mr. Childs combined Agenda Item Nos. 2 and 3 for presentation <br />purposes since the two applications concerned the same applicant and property. He oriented the <br />Commissioners regarding the subject and surrounding properties on the location map, site plan and <br />photographs, and described the proposed projects. Regarding Agenda Item No. 3, he said that the <br />proposed warehouse building could be construed as exempt from the Master Plan for Kailua-Kona <br />architectural design guidelines for the reason that the structure would have no enclosing walls, is <br />evidently intended for industrial uses only, and the building site is set back far from the adjoining <br />streets where the visibility would be nominal. With respect to Agenda Item No. 2, he noted that the <br />proposed addition to the existing customer service building did not appear to comply with the <br />architectural design guidelines for the Kailua Village. He further said that although it seemed <br />reasonable to seek more general compliance with the design guidelines due to the nature of the <br />industrial neighborhood, an alternate exterior design and/or materials, as well as additional <br />landscaping, that are in keeping with the Master Plan would be worth serious consideration. <br /> <br />The applicant’s representative, Scott Fleming, presented further information on the proposal. <br />Regarding Agenda Item No. 2, he said that the applicant had not anticipated to be required in strict <br />compliance with the design guidelines, given the industrial nature of the area, the appearance of <br />neighboring structures and the small scale of their proposed addition. He explained that the flat roof <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.