My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-09-20 Leeward Exh A - DeFranco Paleaku
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2012
>
2012-09-20 Leeward Exh A - DeFranco Paleaku
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2012 2:39:19 PM
Creation date
10/18/2012 2:39:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GIFFIN: Okay, then I guess what I need is process. Daryn, we need to have input from you in <br />terms of how we should include this condition and where, I mean, it may not necessarily be No. 11, <br />it may be inserted somewhere else. <br /> <br />ARAI: Probably the most, probably include it as Condition 8, with all subsequent conditions to be <br />renumbered. And I believe, if you are inclined to support this application, that you can do it all as a <br />single motion by accepting the Planning Director’s recommended conditions of approval, with <br />inclusion of the new Condition 8 as I read to you, with the remaining conditions to be renumbered <br />accordingly. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Thank you. Commissioners, did you get the gist of what Daryn just said that we could in <br />one motion then, if we are inclined to approve this application, with the conditions as put forth by <br />the Department, with the inclusion of a new Condition No. 8 as read by staff, and the renumbering <br />of the subsequent conditions, 9, 10 and 11, correct? Do I hear a motion? Or any discussion? Let’s <br />go to discussion first. As I stated earlier, I have a sense that this is an application that could be met <br />with approval and satisfaction by everyone including the surrounding neighbors and the public. I <br />like it that we have this new condition. And that’s all. Anybody else have any comments? Hearing <br />none, do I hear a motion? Commissioner Beaudet. <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Yes. I move that, move in support of the Planning Director’s recommendation of <br />approval for Special Permit Application No. 12-000137, along with the conditions as stated and <br />new Condition No. 8 as read by staff, with the renumbering of subsequent conditions. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Great. Do I hear a second? <br /> <br />HICKCOX: Second. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Commissioner Hickcox. It’s been moved and seconded that the application, Special <br />Permit Application No. 12-000137, along with the recommendations as submitted by the Planning <br />Director, which includes a new Condition No. 8 as read by staff, and the renumbering of Conditions <br />9, 10 and 11, be approved. Daryn? I’m sorry. All those in favor? <br /> <br />HICKCOX: Daryn. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: We have to do individual, but you want to say something, don’t you? <br /> <br />ARAI: You said renumbering of Conditions 9, 10 and 11. There really is no, I’m not sure what the <br />proper way of saying it, but there is only Conditions 9 and 10, so it would just be the renumbering <br />of Conditions 9 and 10. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Okay, to be 11, right, because then if we -. <br /> <br />ARAI: Yes, yeah, I understand what you are saying -. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Okay. <br /> <br />ARAI: But I just wanted to make that clear. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Okay, thank you. <br />11 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.