|
Ali‘i Drive. Improvements for this section have been promised in various forms and formats for
<br />over 28 years.
<br />
<br />When the plan to construct the connection was proposed and make this a major collector, but not
<br />doing any improvements, local residents were so outraged, because they felt their lives and security
<br />would be threatened, that the County wisely decided to invest up to 1.2 million dollars in a Context
<br />Sensitive Solution process to identify the needs and concerns that fit the local context of the
<br />neighborhood, and along with the process, completing the environmental assessment for the
<br />roadway. The Context Sensitive Solution process integrates essential safety and access concerns.
<br />The result of this CSS process was integrated as part of the final environmental assessment and the
<br />finding of no significant impact. However, two components are not yet part of the current plan to
<br />be constructed that’s the subject of this SMA application.
<br />
<br />First, the CSS process resulted in a recommendation of one alternative for construction; it did not
<br />divide it, it did not segregate it, it did not separate it into multiple projects, but there was just one
<br />recommendation. Further, when funding was sought by the administration, the public was once
<br />again assured that in the – bear with me just a minute – Fiscal Year 2009 to 2010 the Project Data
<br />and Financial Impact Statement was submitted as part of the CIP to include just a single lump sum
<br />amount in one given year for construction. This included both the connection and the
<br />improvements that were warranted for the lower part of the roadway. Well, the administration, I
<br />feel, is quite wise and pragmatic and perhaps even a little bit shrewd to proceed with bidding of
<br />only the major construction portion to ascertain how much it’s going to cost. It’s still absolutely
<br />crucial that we prosecute concurrently, not just the completed – excuse me, I should rephrase that –
<br />the improvements must be prosecuted concurrently and completed prior to converting La‘aloa from
<br />essentially a cul-de-sac to a 60-foot wide major collector and opening it to traffic. And just
<br />references in the notice that was sent to the public, the most critical portion that lacks sidewalks,
<br />there is no additional room, and includes a curve that at times is a blind curve, is not even scheduled
<br />to the third phase.
<br />
<br />Second, under the premise for the project to provide an alternative evacuation route as, again, stated
<br />in the EA for tsunamis or emergencies on Ali‘i Drive, the CSS process stipulated in the CSS report,
<br />and included in the appendix of the EA, that “Street lighting will be provided along the corridor, all
<br />other utilities will be constructed underground.” For those that have, I believe, a common
<br />understanding of the types of events that can occur, placing overhead utilities with the cable, the
<br />electrical, telephone lines overhead, where they can be damaged in the one event that’s necessary
<br />for an evacuation, would not be the best decision to make. I’ve never heard of it in years of my
<br />experience in engineering that that would be the most prudent form to do. So I believe the prudent
<br />opportunity here, as stated in the EA, is that for the mere, I think it’s only six spans of electric lines,
<br />should be placed out of harm’s way and underground just like the rest of the roadway would be.
<br />But this is the portion that’s right down at the bottom of Ali‘i Drive.
<br />
<br />There is a third issue I want to bring up as well, too, as it relates to access. And I will contend that
<br />for cars and trucks the design as proposed is going to be adequate. However, where the road
<br />approaches a 14 percent gradient, that’s about twice as steep coming up Kealakehe Parkway, they
<br />just on the plans are adding a sidewalk or two; it’s not going to be adequate. I suspect most
<br />pedestrians and virtually all but elite bicyclists wouldn’t be able to ascend this grade. And for that
<br />reason, approximately two and a half years ago, the Kona CDP Action Committee revised the
<br />official transportation network to include a switchback shared-use path in this corridor, which
<br />would reduce the gradient that allow virtually pedestrians of all abilities and bicyclists of all skill
<br />2
<br />EXHIBIT B
<br />
<br />
|