Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ward provided clarification that one of the graphics within Table 2 were supposed to be taken <br />39 <br />out. Correction was noted and the printed version will have that graphic deleted. <br />40 <br />The Action Committee were assured that the VDG is meant to be a dynamic document and as <br />41 <br />the Department identifies issues/concerns/amendments that they will be working with the AC <br />42 <br />to amend. <br />43 <br />The Action Committee began to discuss the proposed amendments <br />44 <br />Concerns/Comments/Issues: <br />45 <br />Chapter 8, Dedication of Land. <br />46 <br /> <br /> <br />Appears that there are only one change – there does not appear to be a clear relation <br />47 <br />to the KCDP <br />48 <br /> <br /> <br />Opportunity for additional changes – <br />49 <br /> <br />adding in requirements that also include in the mixed use commercial space to <br />50 <br />o <br />allocate the need to develop/dedicate park space. <br />51 <br /> <br />Not to exclude public utility (requiring easements/land could be very nice <br />52 <br />o <br />linear parks). <br />53 <br />The Action Committee agreed to delay further discussion on the draft amendments to the <br />54 <br />County Code Chapters until the Director is able to join the meeting. (The AC discussed the <br />55 <br />Open Space Network and Outreach Sub-Committee) <br />56 <br />When the Director arrived at the meeting resumed the discussion <br />57 <br />The Director provided background information regarding the proposed revision to Chapter 8, <br />58 <br />Dedication of Land. <br />59 <br /> <br /> <br />Not specifically addressing the KCDP however proposal is the result of Community <br />60 <br />Comments – to do a “work around” of impact fees. <br />61 <br /> <br /> <br />Consistency with the Subdivision Code. <br />62 <br /> <br /> <br />To address the needs for park creation for parcels that already have existing zoning <br />63 <br />but are coming in for subdivisions <br />64 <br />Marni Herkes made a motion to have the AC forward on a recommendation of support for <br />65 <br />the proposed amendments to Chapter 8 of the County Code. Bob Ward seconded. Motion <br />66 <br />passed unanimously. <br />67 <br />Discussion of the motion included the request to look towards including calculations for park <br />68 <br />requirements the amount of space utilized for industrial and commercial. It was pointed out <br />69 <br />that the VDG includes in a requirement for parks and the Public Facilities Finance Plan also <br />70 <br />addressed the development of parks/funding of parks. It was emphasized that the revision to <br />71 <br />Chapter 8 are really targeting the subdivisions of existing zoned parcels of land. <br />72 <br />This is the first AC that is viewing these proposed amendments, the Director is planning to <br />73 <br />take them out to all of the ACs prior to proceeding on to the Planning Commission and <br />74 <br />County Council. <br />75 <br />Chapter 23 – Subdivision <br />76 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br />