Laserfiche WebLink
Natural Resources <br />19. FLORAL AND FAUNAL RESOURCES <br />The subject parcel is mostly grassy with the perimeter planted with ti and palms. <br />Birds observed are mynah, dove, cardinal, Japanese white-eye and finch. Animals <br />not observed, but common in the area, are mongoose, feral cats, rats and coqui frogs. <br />20. SCENIC OR COASTAL RESOURCES <br />As the subject parcel is located approximately eight miles from the shoreline, there are <br />no coastal resources. The property is not listed as a natural beauty site. <br />Valued Cultural Resources <br />21. TRADITIONAL AND CUSTOMARY NATIVE HAWAIIAN RIGHTS <br />No traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights are exercised in the area. <br />Public Access <br />22. EXISTING PUBLIC ACCESS <br />As the subject parcel is not near the shoreline or mountain areas, no public access is <br />affected. <br />Social-Economic Characteristics <br />23. SOCIAL SETTLEMENT PATTERN FOR THE AREA <br />The Puna District occupies a major section of the south-east corner of the Big Island. <br />The principal city influencing the district is Hilo, with a 2010 population of 50,927. <br />The modern development of Puna principally took place in the inland sections, areas <br />amenable to sugar production. Nationally distinct camps, many of which later <br />developed into villages, were set up for immigrant workers from Japan and the <br />Philippines. Large acreages of sugar cane and native Ohia forest separated the camps <br />and villages. Sugar has declined in Hawaii as a major industry and the Puna District was <br />hit particularly hard by the closing of Puna Sugar Company in 1982. A decline in <br />population had already been occurring in the area as workers voluntarily moved into <br />other occupations or were laid off. Beginning in the late 19�60s, "Immigrants from the <br />U.S. mainland began to enter the population in the rural subdivisions. These regions <br />had been created out of the forest and abandoned sugarland and were made up of <br />cheaply priced lots. These subdivisions lacked electricity, telephone service, piped <br />water, sewage lines and paved roads. However, people began to settle permanently <br />in these subdivisions. In the 1970s and 1980s, a larger group of new residents from <br />elsewhere in Hawaii entered Puna, a trend that continues. Since then, the cost of land <br />and houses has increased rapidly across the State, while prices remained relatively low <br />in Puna. The result has been a rapidly increasing suburban population in Puna. <br />Between 1990 and 20100 Puna's population increased 50.8% from 201.,,781 to 31,335, and <br />went up a further 44.6% to 45.,326 by 2010. <br />24. ECONOMIC RESOURCES OF THE AREA <br />The population of Puna during the past 30 years has increased at a substantially higher <br />