My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-10-18 Leeward Exh B - DPW Laaloa
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2012
>
2012-10-18 Leeward Exh B - DPW Laaloa
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2012 11:53:40 AM
Creation date
11/16/2012 11:53:34 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
asked for information, and then he submitted his petition for standing right before the deadline, <br />October. And just last night I got an email about some kind of condition where we were, would <br />have to agree to a full EIS and SMA approval for the lower section when we come in – not consider <br />but have to agree – if I recall the email correctly. So, you know, that’s the chronology of events up <br />to this point. So, thank you for giving us the opportunity, more time to give you guys more <br />information to make your decision. Thank you. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Planning Director, as a party, would you like to respond? None? <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: No. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Okay. Commissioners, your feelings on the suggestion from Mr. Vitousek in mediation? <br /> <br />HICKCOX: Not there yet. Madam Chair, I don’t think we are there yet. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Okay. So you think that the wording of what we requested should stay in? <br /> <br />HICKCOX: Yes, ma’am. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Okay. Any other comments? Brandi. <br /> <br />BEAUDET: I think it was a good suggestion and we’ll take it into consideration. But I don’t think <br />the decision, or our motion on it should be, should suffice at this moment in time. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Mr. Torigoe. <br /> <br />TORIGOE: Okay, so, just for the record, at this point in time, you as the presiding officer under <br />your contested case rules, you are basically continuing the matter for the reason stated? Is that what <br />is happening? <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Yes. <br /> <br />TORIGOE: Okay, so no motion required at this point. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Absolutely. <br /> <br />TORIGOE: Okay. And I don’t know if you, there is any more clarity regarding the exact type of <br />information that the Commissioners would like. Is there anything else you want to say about that? <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Commissioners, is there anything more specific that you would like to have discussed <br />between the applicant for standing and Public Works and/or the Planning Director? <br /> <br />TORIGOE: Yeah, actually, I was kind of more getting to if there are specific types of plans or, you <br />know, documentation -. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Oh, I see what you mean. Okay. So is there anything else that you want to have them <br />come up with in addition to what we talked about for the intersection? Brandi. <br /> <br />24 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.