Laserfiche WebLink
<br />AU: Okay. Well, that would definitely be something that if Madam Director drafts it or if, I believe, a <br />Commissioner can put it in as a condition. Is that correct? Not necessarily? Or it would have to be in <br />Madam Director’s draft? <br /> <br />ARAI: It would probably have to be incorporated within draft rules, if you want that component to be <br />explicitly clear. But that’s something, again, they can make the recommendation once the draft rules <br />are prepared and the Commission can consider to incorporate it or not. <br /> <br />AU: Okay, okay. Well, we’ve got time as far as the first, the initial one which would be draft and, you <br />know, you have time to testify. <br /> <br />PETRICCI: Just one little note on the history, there’s been several studies attempted; and one was <br />done by the Department of Health, and I’m sure the Planning Director is aware of this, so one was <br />done by the Department of Health, the community wasn’t, didn’t think it was done in a way that was <br />acceptable to the community. Another was done by the University of Texas that the developer wasn’t - <br />. So, you know, that’s our problem. We need something that’s going to be acceptable to everybody so <br />we don’t just spin our wheels and keep doing the same thing. <br /> <br />AU: Okay. Thank you very much. <br /> <br />The discussion ended at 5:22 p.m. <br /> <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> Sharon M. Nomura, Secretary <br /> Windward Planning Commission <br /> 14 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />