Laserfiche WebLink
LEITHEAD TODD: For the Commission’s information, Item No. 7 is basically so we could comply <br />with the Sunshine Law. We don’t have specific written proposals to amend the rule. But in order to <br />allow the Commission to discuss possible amendments to Rule 12, that is why we have this on the <br />agenda, just so that we can comply with the Sunshine Law, if it is the desire of the Commission. What <br />we are really here to do more is the administrative matters, which is the letters from Mr. Yagong, and <br />from Mr. Blas regarding the geothermal. <br /> <br />AU: Thank you, Madam Director. So, staff, is there a staff presentation, is there a brief, or -? <br /> <br />ARAI: Yeah, just briefly. Again, there are two communications from the Planning Department that I <br />would like to draw your attention to, and it was previously distributed to you. First of all is a letter <br />dated October 3, 2012 from the Director to the Commission. It basically provided a background <br />information regarding GRP No. 2, as well as some points of discussion regarding both letters from <br />former Council Members Yagong and Blas. In a nutshell, as the Director mentioned, their request is <br />basically asking what is the procedure in which a proposed health study can be funded by the <br />Geothermal Asset Fund. There was also a second letter that was provided to the Commission dated <br />November 7, 2012 in which the Planning Director offered her analysis regarding the possible funding <br />of a health study by the Geothermal Asset Fund. <br /> <br />So basically what you have before you are, is the request, as well as some background information and <br />the Director’s analysis and recommendation. In a nutshell we believe that the Geothermal Asset Fund <br />can fund a health study. But it may need some adjustments or modifications to your rules in order to <br />accomplish that more effectively. But in order to accomplish that, we probably need some direction <br />from the Commission on how you would like it to be accomplished. So basically we need a directive <br />from the Commission. <br /> <br />So I stand ready to answer any questions that you may have at this time. <br /> <br />AU: Any questions for Daryn? <br /> <br />ISHIBASHI: Brother Chair, I’m excusing myself on the side. <br /> <br />AU: Okay, thank you. Let’s put our stuff together as Commissioner Ishibashi takes a seat with the <br />public. Okay, we have four people signed up to testify. Why don’t you all just come up – Kerri <br />Marks, Robert Petricci, and Tom Travis. So what we’ll do is we’re taking testimony on Agenda No. 7, <br />as well as administrative matters. Is that correct? Mr.Arai, is that correct, we’re taking testimony on <br />behalf of No. 7 as well as administrative matters? Or do we need to take testimony out of -. <br /> <br />ARAI: Well, I guess you could speak on both, but there is no specific proposal to amend Rule 12 at <br />this time. But I guess they could if they have any specific comments or suggestions on any of the <br />amendments to Rule 12. <br /> <br />AU: And we have a Laura Travis? <br /> <br />L. TRAVIS: Okay. Actually I’m going to donate my time to either Tom or Kerri. Kerri will also <br />testify. <br /> 2 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br /> <br /> <br />