Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />2.Criteria for Action Committee Definition of Community: <br />Public Testimony: <br /> <br />i.Stephanie Bath expressed her concerns with the some of the criteria proposed in <br />Communication 2013-9 particularly regarding legally recognized associations that are <br />not actually responsive to or representative of the community they claim to represent. <br /> <br />ii.Hannah Hedrick requested that the AC postpone taking any action on the proposed <br />criteria until the public has been afforded an opportunity to provide input on the <br />document. Too many existing legally recognized associations are organized around and <br />focused on issues and concerns not necessarily consistent with the PCDP. <br />Farris explained some of the thought processes that led to the draft criteria presented and what <br />categories of community groups were identified playing a role in Puna. <br />Dan moved to table Communication 2013-9 and further discussion on this matter to the <br />next AC meeting. Second by Sharon. <br />Motion approved with 9 votes aye. <br />AGENDA REQUESTS FOR NEXT MEETING (March 12, 2013): <br /> <br />1.Criteria for Action Committee Definition of Community - Farris <br /> <br />2.Ongoing project update - Dan <br /> <br />3.Support letter for Red Road Scenic Byways designation - Farris <br /> <br />4.Subdivision Connectivity subcommittee report <br /> <br />5.Glenwood Park proposal - Sharon <br />ADJOURNMENT: <br />Farris moved to adjourn the meeting. Second by René. <br />Motion passed with 9 aye votes. <br />Meeting adjourned at 5:38 p.m. <br />3 <br /> <br />