My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-08-02 Windward Transcript Poloke Farms
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2012
>
2012-08-02 Windward Transcript Poloke Farms
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2013 9:55:33 AM
Creation date
3/6/2013 9:55:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
KERN: Why don’t we go ahead to your testimony. You can pose that question and afterwards we <br />could get an answer to that. <br /> <br />FREDERICK: Okay. I didn’t catch the name of the person who did the introduction, and he did cover <br />most of my questions. I guess I would add, you’re saying that my question No. 5 which was according <br />to Condition 16.E. if an additional extension of time was required, the Planning Department was to <br />submit that request, and supposedly this is that request. However, it really should have been done at <br />one year, not 2 years later, and technically 27 months. <br /> <br />And my concern is that if Mr. Anderson hasn’t been able, if these conditions haven’t been able to be <br />met with in 27 months how likely is it for them to be approved within 24 months? You know, I <br />understand things take a while. It seems to me that a timely fashion is something that should be <br />adhered to. Twenty-seven months is -. I guess I would ask you, how do you define a timely fashion? <br />Would any of you say that 27 months is timely? So, it’s already four times the initial amount of time <br />that was allowed, six months. It has more than four times that length of time to date; and now he’s <br />asking for an additional two years. During this time he has been continuing to have events <br />periodically. <br /> <br />And in the Committee’s own letter granting the request it’s, and it is Condition 3, not Condition 8, but <br />prior to the continuation of the country market and associated uses, the applicant shall secure and <br />finalize any building permits required. And keep in mind this is prior to the continuation, which means <br />that all of these things are technically by letter, you know, by how this is worded, they’re supposed to <br />be met before other events are held. And that’s not something that has been enforced to date. <br /> <br />So my request is that any extension the committee grants be of a limited duration, for example, six <br />months; and during that time I’m requesting that the committee enforce its Condition 3 requiring all <br />conditions be met prior to having other events. <br /> <br />And, finally, if an extension is granted and Mr. Anderson has failed to come into compliance -. <br /> <br />KERN: Thank you. <br /> <br />FREDERICK: I’m not done. <br /> <br />KERN: It’s three minutes. <br /> <br />FREDERICK: Three minutes, okay. This is just my last -. <br /> <br />KERN: I have to treat everybody the same. <br /> <br />FREDERICK: I understand. My last request is that the Planning Commission recommend the <br />Planning Director initiate revocation procedures. <br /> <br />KERN: Thank you. I would like Jeff to answer that first question. Could you please re-ask the <br />question. <br /> <br /> 6 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.