My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-08-02 Windward Transcript Council CDH
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2012
>
2012-08-02 Windward Transcript Council CDH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2013 9:57:19 AM
Creation date
3/6/2013 9:57:19 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
In this particular instance it was focused more on the parking requirements. They were trying to <br />specify a certain amount of parking per residential unit when Downtown Hilo currently has no parking <br />requirement. But what happened is they failed to look at amending another section of the Code which <br />still said no parking required in Downtown Hilo. So for people like us, the planners, as well as anyone <br />who has to adhere to the Code, when you look at the two sections of the Code, there will be a conflict. <br />We did meet with Councilperson Ikeda who introduced the bill, and he understood what we were <br />pointing out. And he was more than willing to work with our office to craft a proper bill, and he will <br />then at that point reintroduce it. <br /> <br />The reason this is coming back, coming before you, even knowing what we know, is because once the <br />Council referred it down to the Planning Commission, there was no way for the Council to sort of pull <br />it back. Once it goes, it goes. And at that point, the Planning Department is also compelled to <br />recommend either approval or denial. There’s no in between, which is why you’ll see in the <br />recommendation that we are recommending an unfavorable recommendation, but without prejudice. <br />It’s not like we’re passing judgment on the proposal at this time. It’s simply because we’re going to <br />look forward to the resubmittal of a bill that is properly constructed. So with that I stand ready to <br />answer any questions that you have. <br /> <br />KERN: Any questions for staff? Commissioner Ono. <br /> <br />ONO: Is this a focus on the residential areas primarily, this parking problem, or is this -? Because I notice <br />they’re looking at the units being 500 square-foot. And so I’m kind of wondering as to where is the emphasis, <br />industrial areas, or restaurants, or what? <br /> <br />ARAI: The bill is only focused for the area designated Downtown Hilo Commercial by the Zoning Code, and <br />that area is bordered by Kapiolani Street, and I think Ponahawai and Wailuku, so basically the old section of <br />town, Downtown Hilo. Because of the way Downtown Hilo is designed, meaning the structures are all front <br />loaded right up against the street, there’s really no parking. Everybody has to park on the street. Many years <br />ago the Council introduced or designated a special zoning classification, Downtown Hilo Commercial. And it’s <br />sort of like trying to accommodate the way Downtown Hilo evolved over a time. Residences above your <br />commercial uses, sort of like a mixed use commercial district, no parking, no setbacks, because there’s nothing, <br />you know, no way for you to fit things on the property. So it was a special zoning district classification. But <br />one thing it did was place a limit on the maximum density, residential density, permitted in Downtown Hilo, <br />which is basically 1,000 square feet of land area per unit. The proposed bill was attempting to double the <br />density up to 500 square feet of land area per unit. That is consistent with your General Plan, which designates <br />Downtown Hilo for High Density Urban, as well as modifying the parking requirements. Because right now <br />you could put a residential use; like an apartment complex, in Downtown Hilo, but no parking is required, no <br />on-site parking is required. The bill was attempting to at least require one stall per unit. <br /> <br />ONO: My next question, if you don’t mind. <br /> <br />KERN: Go ahead. <br /> <br />ONO: I’m kind of wondering in terms of today’s society one parking per unit is kind of not realistic, yeah? <br /> <br />ARAI: Well, it depends on the locale. If you situate residential uses above commercial uses and in an area that <br />has a mix of uses the assumption is that you become less vehicle dependent. Things are more within walking <br />distance; and that’s part of the concept. So people who have no desire to have a car and want to be situated in <br />close proximity to support services and uses would, could find Downtown Hilo attractive. <br /> 2 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.