My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-10-04 Windward Transcript PD yagong & blas
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2012
>
2012-10-04 Windward Transcript PD yagong & blas
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2013 10:01:18 AM
Creation date
3/6/2013 10:01:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />AU: No, that’s good. <br /> <br />KERN: Thanks, gentlemen. Have a seat. Oh, actually is there, any other Commissioners have any <br />questions while they’re up here? Okay, you may have a seat. It has been made aware to all of us as <br />public knowledge that the administration has issued a joint fact finding study. If it’s okay with the <br />Commissioners, if there’s somebody present here from the administration, I would like to hear a little <br />more background; and I think it’s relevant to this overall conversation of a health study. Mr. Melrose, <br />are you prepared for -? And I’ll give you the same ten minutes max. <br /> <br />MELROSE: Good morning. <br /> <br />KERN: Do you swear to tell the truth today before the Windward Planning Commission? <br /> <br />MELROSE: I do <br /> <br />KERN: Okay, give me your name and -. <br /> <br />MELROSE: My name is Jeff Melrose. I’m on special projects in the Mayor’s office. I live in Hilo. <br /> <br />KERN: Very good. Go ahead. <br /> <br />MELROSE: I just want to thank, I think this conversation is a good one. And I appreciate both <br />Councilman Yagong and Mr. Petricci’s comments. The real goal here is to come up with a study that <br />everybody can appreciate and to buy into. And I think identifying what that study looks like is a <br />challenge, particularly for people who are not involved in science. The science of gas studies or <br />toxicity is, you know, is new for everybody in the room probably, and certainly for the people who are <br />going to make decisions about that, which is this Commission. <br /> <br />So several months ago we got into a, you know, our effort was to say, well, let’s figure how we do a <br />study. Let’s, we know the Geothermal Asset Fund is the place to fund this process, let’s make sure we <br />have a fundamental understanding of what works have been done elsewhere, what do we not want to <br />repeat necessarily but what can we do in this circumstance that would address the issue. And I don’t <br />want to say once and for all cause I don’t know that any of this ends up in a once-and-for-all <br />circumstance. But I think it puts together a solid study that says, that helps us to get focused on health <br />issues as they are or aren’t related to the geothermal activities in Puna. <br /> <br />So we’ve contracted with an independent third party whose profession is to develop joint-fact finding. <br />This is a process, it’s a way of looking at complex science issues and building policy based on a <br />common understanding of the science first. So often in these kinds of issues one side gets its scientists <br />and another side gets its scientists and they end up in the middle and they end up fighting, and the only <br />people that are making money are the scientists and the attorneys in the middle of that process. So <br />we’re trying to avoid that process. <br /> <br />So we’ve contracted with a Core 3.0, and Peter Adler. Peter for the last 30 years has been doing, you <br />know, complex issues, management and problem solving on a national scale. And so he will basically <br /> 11 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.