My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-12-06 Windward Transcript HI VOLCANO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2012
>
2012-12-06 Windward Transcript HI VOLCANO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2013 10:59:15 AM
Creation date
3/12/2013 10:59:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
little bit more time. We just didn’t know what the Planning Commission’s schedule was after January <br />so we couldn’t identify a later hearing date. At this point if everything goes well, the date was <br />th <br />November 29. We need to bring it back to the Commission within a certain timeframe. <br /> <br />But the other issue is that there may be other matters that may put this agenda item on hold until <br />they’re resolved; for example, they’re requesting and part of the amendment, to increase the enrollment <br />to the Charter School. What happened is in review of that in comparison to the traffic engineer trip <br />guidelines, it appears to trip the need for a traffic report. So that may be requested prior to coming to <br />the hearing again, the similar situation as we had on the first agenda, so that they can work through that <br />and we can get a recommendation as to traffic issues. And then, secondly, we have these issues <br />regarding the unpermitted structures that we need to work through. We may be able to work through it <br />within that 90-day frame; if not, we need to ask for a little bit more time to resolve those issues before <br />coming back to the Commission. <br /> <br />AU: Okay so the applicant has been doing their part in working with the Planning Department -? <br /> <br />DARROW: Yes. <br /> <br />AU: And they’ve been abiding by the rules and -? <br /> <br />DARROW: Yes. <br /> <br />AU: Okay. Thank you. Any other questions for staff? <br /> <br />GONZALES: I have a question. So with the continuance then are we asking for a continuance for 90 <br />days and then go from there, or is that open ended? <br /> <br />DARROW: You could do that, and then we could come back and ask -. If things aren’t resolved at <br />that time we could ask for another continuance; or we can just keep it open ended and allow the <br />special permit amendment to take its course. And that would be coming to the Commission hopefully <br />within the 90-day timeframe. If not, it may be a little after that to allow the applicants to resolve and <br />work with the Planning Department in resolving these several issues. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Thank you. <br /> <br />AU: Okay, our counsel Ryan Kanakaole has something to say. <br /> <br />KANAKAOLE: Regarding the date, the requirement for a date, for this type of continuance or motion <br />to continue you can continue to a certain event, which would be what’s on the screen behind everyone, <br />or you can set it for a certain date. <br /> <br />AU: Okay, thank you. <br /> <br />DARROW: Thank you. <br /> <br /> 3 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.